Scanned
Recent window: 2 dev-log files (2026-06-24 15:41, 2026-06-24 22:05) and ~30 wiki pages edited in the last 48h (companies, concepts, entities, government, litigation, analysis). Rotation slice: 7 — legislation/ (all, 99 pages). Broken-link analysis ran wiki-wide (existing-slug set vs. every [[wikilink]] target, ranked by inbound count); dangling-reference, anchor-thinness, and recent-thread scans ran over the legislation slice plus the recent window. Deduplicated against the open queue (46 INGEST- tasks, 34 proposed-sources records), the last 7 days of gap-scan reports, and Raw Sources/.
Gaps actioned (5 of ~13 surviving candidates)
New pages created (live)
- Legion v. United States (Anthropic export-directive challenge) — live-thread missing case page. Legion LegalTech's June 23, 2026 federal suit (No. 1:26-cv-02225, D.D.C.) challenging the June 12 Commerce/BIS directive that forced Anthropic to disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all foreign nationals — the first court challenge to export controls used against a commercial AI model rather than hardware. Tracked across both 06-24 dev-logs and Anthropic with no
litigation/page. Built from the verified plaintiff posting (legion.law) plus The Next Web, MSN/Reuters, and the Anthropic statement; distinguished from the separate Anthropic v. United States (Pentagon ban challenge) (Pentagon supply-chain-risk) matter. confidence: medium. Depends on queued source (INGEST-legion-v-united-states-complaint-2026-06-25.md) — complaint cited inline. - Sectoral AI Governance Act of 2026 (Jacobs) — live-thread missing legislation page in today's slice. H.R.9125 (Rep. Sara Jacobs, D-CA-51; introduced June 3, 2026; cosponsor Rep. Valerie Foushee), authorizing agency heads to rule on algorithmic decision-making systems that materially contribute to violations of federal laws the agency already enforces. Named by name in the 06-24 dev-log (an analyst cited FTC personalized-pricing action to argue the bill is "unnecessary"). Built from the verified congress.gov bill record plus SHRM and Inside AI Policy. confidence: medium.
Pages expanded (live)
- Executive Order 13859 — thin anchor in the slice (385 words, in-degree 15, no
sources_count, and no source citations at all — an unsourced page on the first federal AI executive order). Added the Federal Register primary citation (84 FR 3967, Feb 14 2019), a paragraph on the American AI Initiative's five focus areas and its no-new-authority/reporting-driven character, the August 2019 NIST standards plan that led to the AI RMF, and a typed## Relationshipssection. Addedsources_count: 2; 385 → ~520 words. Every prior fact preserved. [primary(Source:)citations added]
Link fixes
[[UK Data Use and Access Act 2025]]→(Source: Raw Sources/UK Data Use and Access Act 2025.md)(2 instances — the "Raw text"/"Raw compilation" footers onlegislation/uk-data-use-access-act-2025.mdandsources/uk-data-use-access-act-2025.md). These were broken[[wikilinks]]pointing at aRaw Sources/file by title; per the citation rules, raw-source pointers use the(Source: Raw Sources/…)form, which both resolves the broken link and conforms to house format. (Not a page alias — corrected to the proper citation form.)
Queued — foundational sources
- Complaint, Legion LegalTech Corp. v. United States (export-directive challenge, D.D.C., No. 1:26-cv-02225, filed June 23, 2026) — primary court filing behind the new Legion v. United States (Anthropic export-directive challenge) page. Verified: legion.law (plaintiff-of-record posting; 43-pp. PDF with an ECF docket link), corroborated by The Next Web / MSN-Reuters / AOL; CourtListener/PACER flagged as the cross-check at ingest. Provenance caveat recorded (plaintiff is an interested party). Queued URL-only (large court PDF):
INGEST-legion-v-united-states-complaint-2026-06-25.md(+ verification record inproposed-sources/). - Five Eyes Cyber Security Agencies, "Call to Action on AI Preparedness" (NCSC-UK; CISA/NSA; CCCS; ACSC; NCSC-NZ; issued June 22, 2026) — named primary government statement from the 06-24 dev-log, foundational for AI and Cybersecurity / Autonomous cyber-agents, with no
sources/page. Verified: NCSC NZ's own government site (issuing agency), corroborated by insiconcyber / LinkedIn News / tegacaysun; confirm a second .gov co-issuer host at ingest. Queued URL-only:INGEST-five-eyes-ai-call-to-action-2026-06-25.md(+ verification record inproposed-sources/).
Authenticity-verification failures
- None this run. Both queued sources verified against canonical primary hosts (a court party-of-record posting and an issuing government agency). Page expansions and new pages used primary/supporting web sources folded as inline
(Source: <URL>).
Deduplicated (already pending / already covered — not re-actioned)
- CREATE AI Act / NAIRR / NIST AI center (House Science 10-bill markup, 06-24/25 dev-log) — CREATE AI Act (Young) already exists and was updated for the markup in the nightly cycle (
last_updated: 2026-06-24); NAIRR has a page. Update-class items fordevelopments-log, not gap-identifier. - SK Hynix · Micron · FERC · DOE · DOD · FTC · Abundance Institute · Americans for Responsible Innovation · Shield AI — all surfaced from the 06-24 dev-logs but already have pages (several edited in the last 48h). News-cycle updates, not gaps.
[[sources/anthropic-pwc-expanded-partnership]](in-degree 6) — recurring supporting-class partnership mis-linked as asources/page; lint territory (fold to inline(Source:)), not gap-identifier.[[claude-code]](in-degree 8, broken) — high-reliance but placement is genuinely ambiguous (an Anthropic product, not a model/company/concept cleanly); AI Coding Agents covers the general category. Held under the quality gate rather than force a mis-filed page — see deferred backlog.
Deferred backlog (over the daily cap — re-surfaces next run)
[[claude-code]](in-degree 8) — the highest-in-degree genuine broken target. Needs a deliberate placement call (fold into Anthropic, add to AI Coding Agents, or a dedicated product page). Score ~4.- LIFT AI Act (Literacy in Future Technologies Artificial Intelligence Act) (in-degree 11, 536 words,
confidence: highwithsources_count: 1) — confidence overstated relative to single-source support; expand to 3 sources or downgrade to medium next run. Score ~4. - Five Eyes co-issuer entity pages (
entities/cisa,entities/ncsc-uk,entities/acsc,entities/cccs) — referenced by the queued Five Eyes statement; build as a small cluster at that source's ingest, not singly. Score ~3. - Broadcom (named in the OpenAI/Broadcom Jalapeño story, no
companies/page) — supporting mention for now; revisit if it recurs as a custom-silicon partner. Score ~3. - Brazil CFM Resolution No. 2,454/2026 (AI-in-medicine standard of care, 06-24 dev-log) — niche international sector reg; hold for a deliberate scoping call (legislation/ vs. a healthcare-industry fold). Score ~3.
entities/sara-jacobs,entities/todd-young— bill sponsors linked from legislation pages with no entity page (pre-existing dangling sponsor refs); build as a small legislators cluster. Score ~2.concepts/ai-regulation-approaches— a sectoral-vs-comprehensive AI-governance concept page would give SAGA and several others a cleaner anchor than the existing Risk-Based AI Regulation / State-Level AI Regulation pair. Score ~3.- Duplicate:
uk-data-use-access-act-2025exists in BOTHlegislation/andsources/— review which is canonical (lint territory; the law belongs inlegislation/, the primary-text summary may stay insources/). Score ~2.
Needs user action
- Dashboard rebuild blocked (recurring).
bin/build-dashboard.pyagain aborted atshutil.rmtree(Wiki/_meta/site/)withPermissionError: Operation not permitted: 'companies 2'— iCloud sync conflict-copy folders (names ending in2) inside the site tree cannot be deleted from this environment (failure logged inneeds-review/daily since 06-06). Delete the2folders insideWiki/_meta/site/in Finder, then runpython3 bin/build-dashboard.py. All of today's content changes (2 new pages, 1 expansion, 2 link fixes) are written to their real folders and will render on the next successful build.
One-line summary
Created two live pages — Legion v. United States (Anthropic export-directive challenge) (first court challenge to AI-model export controls) and Sectoral AI Governance Act of 2026 (Jacobs) (Jacobs's H.R.9125, today's legislation slice) — expanded the previously unsourced Executive Order 13859, fixed two broken raw-source links, and queued the verified Legion complaint and Five Eyes AI cyber statement for review; claude-code and the over-confident LIFT AI Act (Literacy in Future Technologies Artificial Intelligence Act) are the strongest deferred items; the dashboard still needs the manual 2-folder cleanup before it will rebuild.