AI Policy Wiki
Dashboard

Illinois House Bill 5511 — Children's Social Media Safety Act

medium confidence · updated 2026-08-01

Illinois law signed July 31, 2026 barring platforms from using a minor's viewing history or on-device data to rank their feeds, requiring age confirmation through the device operating system, and prohibiting notifications to minors between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Effective 2028; enforced by the Attorney General.

House Bill 5511, the Children's Social Media Safety Act, was signed by Illinois Governor JB Pritzker on July 31, 2026. It regulates how social-media platforms rank content for minors, how they establish user age, and when they may send minors notifications. The law takes effect in 2028 (Source: capitolnewsillinois.com).

Its central provision addresses recommendation systems rather than content: platforms may not use a minor's viewing history or on-device data to rank that minor's feed. This places it in the category of state measures aimed at algorithmic personalization as such; see AI and Children.

Status and timeline

DateEvent
2026Passed both chambers of the Illinois General Assembly unanimously
July 31, 2026Signed by Gov. JB Pritzker
2028Effective date

Key provisions

  • Feed ranking. Platforms are barred from using a minor's viewing history or on-device data to rank their feeds.
  • Age confirmation. Age must be confirmed through the device operating system rather than by platform-side verification.
  • Notification curfew. Notifications to minors are prohibited between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.

(Source: capitolnewsillinois.com)

Enforcement and penalties

Enforcement rests with the office of Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul. Penalties run up to $2,500 per child for unintentional violations and up to $7,500 per child for intentional ones — a per-child rather than per-violation or per-day measure (Source: capitolnewsillinois.com).

Reactions

The bill passed both chambers unanimously. The Illinois Chamber of Commerce, the Motion Picture Association, TechNet and the American Civil Liberties Union opposed the final version — an alignment of industry trade groups with a civil-liberties organization against the same text (Source: capitolnewsillinois.com). The available source does not state the grounds each organization gave.

Open questions

  • The grounds for the ACLU's and the trade associations' opposition are not stated in the available reporting.
  • How device-operating-system age confirmation is to be implemented, and what obligations it places on operating-system vendors rather than platforms, is not specified in the available source.
  • Whether the feed-ranking restriction reaches AI-generated recommendations specifically, or only the use of the two named data categories, is not established.

Relationships