AI Policy Wiki
Dashboard
⚲

System Card: Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic, June 2026)

high confidence · updated 2026-07-26

Anthropic's system card for Claude Sonnet 5, an upgrade to Sonnet 4.6 with agentic gains. Assessed as not advancing Anthropic's capability frontier relative to Opus- and Mythos-class models: very low alignment risk though higher than previous Sonnet models, below the automated AI R&D threshold, limited CBRN uplift for threat actors lacking existing capability, and significantly less capable at cyber tasks than Mythos 5 — so its safeguards match those applied to Opus 4.7 and 4.8.

Published June 30, 2026 for Claude Sonnet 5, described as "an upgrade to Claude Sonnet 4.6, with gains in various aspects of agentic performance."

RSP evaluations

The card's framing turns on relative rather than absolute capability: "Claude Sonnet 5 is our most capable Sonnet-class model, but it does not advance our capability frontier compared to more capable Opus- or Mythos-class models." Under the RSP, that placement is what governs the safeguards applied.

  • Alignment. "Sonnet 5 poses very low alignment risk, though higher than for previous Sonnet models" — a qualified improvement statement rather than a clean one.
  • Automated AI R&D. "Sonnet 5 does not cross the automated AI R&D capability threshold, being less capable than Claude Mythos 5 on every automated evaluation."
  • Chemical and biological. Uplift "of threat actors who otherwise lack the ability to develop such weapons" is assessed as limited, "with uncertainty about the extent to which weapons development by threat actors with existing expertise may be accelerated." The residual uncertainty is about accelerating the already-capable, not about enabling the incapable.

Cyber

The card distinguishes emergent from targeted capability: "Sonnet 5 is not a model optimized for cyber capabilities; any cyber-relevant skill it demonstrates likely emerges from its general capabilities, rather than targeted training."

The safeguards decision follows from the comparison: Sonnet 5 "is significantly less capable at cyber tasks than Mythos 5: its safeguards are thus similar to those we apply to Opus 4.7 and Opus 4.8 (models that are more capable than Sonnet 5 but much less capable than Mythos 5)." Four cyber evaluations are reported in depth. See AI and Cybersecurity.

Safeguards and behaviour

Performance on Usage Policy prompts, user wellbeing, and bias and integrity is reported as similar to previous models, with the tracking and surveillance evaluation suite updated "to keep our multi-turn evaluations aligned with evolving threat vectors and adversarial behaviors."

The one behavioural improvement singled out concerns when the model raises concerns rather than whether it refuses: Sonnet 5 "improves over previous models in the timing and calibration of its engagement with potentially harmful requests (it tends to surface concerns about a request's end goal earlier in conversations, for instance asking the purpose of a requested artifact before beginning work)."

Agentic safety evaluations cover malicious use of coding and computer use.

Reported results

Evaluation results the document states for which there is no separate benchmark page; results on benchmarks that have a page are recorded there and cite this page. Scores and settings are as printed in the document.

EvaluationModelScoreSettingSection
Long-form virology task 1 — End-to-endClaude Sonnet 50.79falls slightly below the 0.80 notable-capability benchmark; 3.33% of trials ran without an external sequence-comparison service that was rate-limited; developer-reported2.2.4
Long-form virology task 1 — End-to-endClaude Opus 4.70.82reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card2.2.4
Long-form virology tasks — End-to-endThreshold (notable capability)0.80Anthropic's stated benchmark of notable capability; the card says Sonnet 5 exceeds it on Task 2 without giving that score2.2.4
DNA Synthesis Screening EvasionClaude Sonnet 55 of 10 pathogensviable plasmids on at least one screening method; does not meet the low-concern threshold of all 10; developer-reported2.2.4
Kernel task (best speedup on hard task) — Standard scaffoldClaude Sonnet 5284.52×AI R&D rule-out suite; developer-reported2.3.3
Kernel task (best speedup on hard task) — Standard scaffoldClaude Mythos 5430.93×reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card2.3.3
Kernel task (best speedup on hard task) — Standard scaffoldClaude Opus 4.7371.75×reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card2.3.3
Kernel task (best speedup on hard task) — Standard scaffoldThreshold (human-effort equivalent)4× = 1 h eq.; 200× = 8 h eq.; 300× = 40 h eq.thresholds as printed in Table 2.3.3.A2.3.3
Time Series Forecasting (MSE on hard variant)Claude Sonnet 55.80lower is better; developer-reported2.3.3
Time Series Forecasting (MSE on hard variant)Claude Mythos 54.51reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card2.3.3
Time Series Forecasting (MSE on hard variant)Claude Opus 4.74.78reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card2.3.3
Time Series Forecasting (MSE on hard variant)Threshold (human-effort equivalent)<5.3 = 40 h eq.threshold as printed in Table 2.3.3.A2.3.3
LLM training (avg speedup)Claude Sonnet 526.49×fixed-CPU re-run methodology from the Mythos 5 system card; developer-reported2.3.3
LLM training (avg speedup)Claude Mythos 569.61×reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card2.3.3
LLM training (avg speedup)Claude Opus 4.750.67×reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card2.3.3
LLM training (avg speedup)Threshold (human-effort equivalent)>4× = 4–8 h eq.threshold as printed in Table 2.3.3.A2.3.3
Quadruped RL (highest score; no hparams)Claude Sonnet 519.94developer-reported2.3.3
Quadruped RL (highest score; no hparams)Claude Mythos 529.55reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card2.3.3
Quadruped RL (highest score; no hparams)Claude Opus 4.724.73reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card2.3.3
Quadruped RL (highest score; no hparams)Threshold (human-effort equivalent)>12 = 4 h eq.threshold as printed in Table 2.3.3.A2.3.3
Novel Compiler (pass rate on complex tests)Claude Sonnet 576.1%developer-reported2.3.3
Novel Compiler (pass rate on complex tests)Claude Mythos 585.3%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card2.3.3
Novel Compiler (pass rate on complex tests)Claude Opus 4.770.4%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card2.3.3
Novel Compiler (pass rate on complex tests)Threshold (human-effort equivalent)90% = 40 h eq.threshold as printed in Table 2.3.3.A2.3.3
ExploitBench — Bugs reaching arbitrary code executionClaude Sonnet 50developer-reported3.2.1
ExploitBench — Bugs reaching arbitrary code executionClaude Mythos 5132reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card3.2.1
ExploitBench — Bugs reaching arbitrary code executionClaude Opus 4.82reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card3.2.1
ExploitBench — Bugs reaching arbitrary code executionClaude Sonnet 4.60reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card3.2.1
OSS-Fuzz (Anthropic internal) — Failed to score (grade 0)Claude Sonnet 545.5%~830 entry points from 228 open-source projects; five grade levels 0.2–1.0; reached 0.8 on two targets and 1.0 on none; safeguards off; developer-reported3.2.2
OSS-Fuzz (Anthropic internal) — Failed to score (grade 0)Claude Sonnet 4.668.4%reached 0.6 on one target only; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card3.2.2
OSS-Fuzz (Anthropic internal) — Failed to score (grade 0)Claude Opus 4.838.5%high of 0.6; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card3.2.2
OSS-Fuzz (Anthropic internal) — Failed to score (grade 0)Claude Mythos 520.0%reached a full 1.0 on 13 occasions; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card3.2.2
OSS-Fuzz (Anthropic internal) — With default mitigationsClaude Sonnet 50scored 0 with Anthropic's default mitigations enabled; developer-reported3.2.2
Firefox 147 (Anthropic–Mozilla) — Full working exploit (1.0)Claude Sonnet 5050 crash categories × 5 trials = 250 trials; SpiderMonkey shell container; default security mitigations off; developer-reported3.2.4
Firefox 147 (Anthropic–Mozilla) — Register control (0.5)Claude Sonnet 533 / 25013.2% of trials; developer-reported3.2.4
Firefox 147 (Anthropic–Mozilla) — Register control (0.5)Claude Sonnet 4.622 / 2508.8% of trials; no full exploits; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card3.2.4
Firefox 147 (Anthropic–Mozilla) — Full working exploit (1.0)Claude Opus 4.88.8%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card3.2.4
Firefox 147 (Anthropic–Mozilla) — Any success (≥0.5)Claude Opus 4.868.8%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card3.2.4
Firefox 147 (Anthropic–Mozilla) — Full working exploit (1.0)Claude Mythos 588.4%221 of 250 trials; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card3.2.4
Firefox 147 (Anthropic–Mozilla) — With default mitigationsClaude Sonnet 50scored 0 with Anthropic's default mitigations enabled; developer-reported3.2.4
Single-turn harmful requests — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 596.65% (± 0.15%)harmless response rate; 16 policy areas, 7 languages; aggregated across thinking enabled and disabled; developer-reported4.1.1
Single-turn harmful requests — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 599.20% (± 0.07%)near-final claude.ai system prompt; developer-reported4.1.1
Single-turn harmful requests — API, no system promptClaude Fable 596.94% (± 0.21%)thinking-only; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.1
Single-turn harmful requests — Claude.aiClaude Fable 598.51% (± 0.14%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.1
Single-turn harmful requests — API, no system promptClaude Mythos 597.09% (± 0.20%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.1
Single-turn harmful requests — API, no system promptClaude Opus 4.897.46% (± 0.13%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.1
Single-turn harmful requests — Claude.aiClaude Opus 4.898.79% (± 0.09%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.1
Single-turn harmful requests — API, no system promptClaude Mythos Preview95.86% (± 0.24%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.1
Single-turn harmful requests — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 4.697.71% (± 0.13%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.1
Single-turn harmful requests — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 4.698.29% (± 0.11%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.1
Single-turn benign requests — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 50.59% (± 0.05%)over-refusal rate; developer-reported4.1.2
Single-turn benign requests — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 51.54% (± 0.10%)developer-reported4.1.2
Single-turn benign requests — API, no system promptClaude Fable 50.01% (± 0.01%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.2
Single-turn benign requests — Claude.aiClaude Fable 50.49% (± 0.07%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.2
Single-turn benign requests — API, no system promptClaude Mythos 50.03% (± 0.02%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.2
Single-turn benign requests — API, no system promptClaude Opus 4.80.35% (± 0.04%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.2
Single-turn benign requests — Claude.aiClaude Opus 4.80.55% (± 0.06%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.2
Single-turn benign requests — API, no system promptClaude Mythos Preview0.01% (± 0.01%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.2
Single-turn benign requests — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 4.60.40% (± 0.05%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.2
Single-turn benign requests — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 4.60.99% (± 0.08%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.1.2
Child safety, single-turn harmful — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 599.95% (± 0.05%)harmless rate, all tested languages; developer-reported4.2
Child safety, single-turn benign — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 50.63% (± 0.22%)refusal rate; developer-reported4.2
Child safety, single-turn harmful — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 599.89% (± 0.11%)developer-reported4.2
Child safety, single-turn benign — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 51.35% (± 0.37%)developer-reported4.2
Child safety, single-turn harmful — API, no system promptClaude Fable 5100%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn benign — API, no system promptClaude Fable 50.00%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn harmful — Claude.aiClaude Fable 5100%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn benign — Claude.aiClaude Fable 50.12% (± 0.15%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn harmful — API, no system promptClaude Mythos 5100%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn benign — API, no system promptClaude Mythos 50.00%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn harmful — API, no system promptClaude Opus 4.8100%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn benign — API, no system promptClaude Opus 4.80.44% (± 0.18%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn harmful — Claude.aiClaude Opus 4.8100%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn benign — Claude.aiClaude Opus 4.80.38% (± 0.18%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn harmful — API, no system promptClaude Mythos Preview99.88% (± 0.15%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn benign — API, no system promptClaude Mythos Preview0.00%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn harmful — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 4.699.94% (± 0.08%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn benign — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 4.60.36% (± 0.20%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn harmful — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 4.699.96% (± 0.04%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, single-turn benign — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 4.60.69% (± 0.28%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, multi-turn — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 588% (± 3%)appropriate response rate; developer-reported4.2
Child safety, multi-turn — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 596% (± 2%)developer-reported4.2
Child safety, multi-turn — API, no system promptClaude Fable 588% (± 5%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, multi-turn — Claude.aiClaude Fable 596% (± 3%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, multi-turn — API, no system promptClaude Mythos 589% (± 5%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, multi-turn — API, no system promptClaude Opus 4.889% (± 3%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, multi-turn — Claude.aiClaude Opus 4.896% (± 2%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, multi-turn — API, no system promptClaude Mythos Preview85% (± 5%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, multi-turn — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 4.692% (± 3%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Child safety, multi-turn — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 4.685% (± 4%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.2
Suicide and self-harm, single-turn potential risk — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 598.80% (± 0.30%)harmless rate; developer-reported4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, single-turn benign — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 50.15% (± 0.08%)refusal rate; developer-reported4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, single-turn potential risk — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 599.82% (± 0.11%)developer-reported4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, single-turn benign — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 50.45% (± 0.23%)developer-reported4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, single-turn potential risk — API, no system promptClaude Fable 599.34% (± 0.30%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, single-turn potential risk — Claude.aiClaude Fable 599.95% (± 0.09%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, single-turn potential risk — API, no system promptClaude Mythos 599.67% (± 0.22%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, single-turn potential risk — API, no system promptClaude Opus 4.899.21% (± 0.23%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card; the Opus 5 card gives 99.28% for the same cell — see Notes4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, single-turn potential risk — Claude.aiClaude Opus 4.899.95% (± 0.05%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, single-turn potential risk — API, no system promptClaude Mythos Preview99.60% (± 0.26%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, single-turn potential risk — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 4.699.65% (± 0.19%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, single-turn potential risk — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 4.699.67% (± 0.19%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, multi-turn — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 563% (± 10%)appropriate response rate; developer-reported4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, multi-turn — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 590% (± 6%)developer-reported4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, multi-turn — API, no system promptClaude Fable 558% (± 14%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, multi-turn — Claude.aiClaude Fable 596% (± 6%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, multi-turn — API, no system promptClaude Mythos 554% (± 14%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, multi-turn — API, no system promptClaude Opus 4.861% (± 10%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, multi-turn — Claude.aiClaude Opus 4.885% (± 7%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, multi-turn — API, no system promptClaude Mythos Preview70% (± 13%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, multi-turn — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 4.674% (± 9%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Suicide and self-harm, multi-turn — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 4.682% (± 8%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.1
Disordered eating, single-turn potential risk — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 597.10% (± 0.53%)harmless rate; developer-reported4.3.2
Disordered eating, single-turn benign — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 50.09% (± 0.06%)refusal rate; developer-reported4.3.2
Disordered eating, single-turn potential risk — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 599.55% (± 0.19%)developer-reported4.3.2
Disordered eating, single-turn benign — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 50.31% (± 0.17%)developer-reported4.3.2
Disordered eating, single-turn potential risk — API, no system promptClaude Fable 597.88% (± 0.67%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.2
Disordered eating, single-turn potential risk — Claude.aiClaude Fable 599.67% (± 0.25%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.2
Disordered eating, single-turn potential risk — API, no system promptClaude Mythos 597.88% (± 0.66%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.2
Disordered eating, single-turn potential risk — API, no system promptClaude Opus 4.897.70% (± 0.47%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.2
Disordered eating, single-turn potential risk — Claude.aiClaude Opus 4.899.70% (± 0.17%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.2
Disordered eating, single-turn potential risk — API, no system promptClaude Mythos Preview95.90% (± 0.97%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.2
Disordered eating, single-turn potential risk — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 4.697.21% (± 0.55%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.2
Disordered eating, single-turn potential risk — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 4.698.63% (± 0.38%)reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.3.2
Political even-handedness (Anthropic open-source eval) — RefusalsClaude Sonnet 54.7%1,350 prompt pairs, 150 topics, 9 task types; public system prompt applied; lowest of the three models compared; developer-reported4.4.1
BBQ — Disambiguated accuracyClaude Sonnet 572.4%no system prompt, thinking off; developer-reported4.4.2
BBQ — Ambiguous accuracyClaude Sonnet 598.6%developer-reported4.4.2
BBQ — Disambiguated accuracyClaude Mythos 584.5%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Ambiguous accuracyClaude Mythos 599.9%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Disambiguated accuracyClaude Opus 4.872.1%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Ambiguous accuracyClaude Opus 4.899.9%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Disambiguated accuracyClaude Mythos Preview84.6%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Ambiguous accuracyClaude Mythos Preview100%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Disambiguated accuracyClaude Sonnet 4.688.1%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Ambiguous accuracyClaude Sonnet 4.697.5%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Disambiguated bias scoreClaude Sonnet 51.93%closer to zero is better; developer-reported4.4.2
BBQ — Ambiguous bias scoreClaude Sonnet 50.52%developer-reported4.4.2
BBQ — Disambiguated bias scoreClaude Mythos 5-1.80%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Ambiguous bias scoreClaude Mythos 50.10%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Disambiguated bias scoreClaude Opus 4.8-1.37%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Ambiguous bias scoreClaude Opus 4.80.07%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Disambiguated bias scoreClaude Mythos Preview-1.61%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Ambiguous bias scoreClaude Mythos Preview0.01%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Disambiguated bias scoreClaude Sonnet 4.6-0.67%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
BBQ — Ambiguous bias scoreClaude Sonnet 4.61.41%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.2
Election integrity, single-turn harmful — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 5100%300 violative and 300 benign prompts; harmless rate; developer-reported4.4.3
Election integrity, single-turn benign — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 50.00%refusal rate; developer-reported4.4.3
Election integrity, single-turn harmful — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 5100%developer-reported4.4.3
Election integrity, single-turn benign — Claude.aiClaude Sonnet 50.00%developer-reported4.4.3
Election integrity, single-turn harmful — API, no system promptClaude Fable 599.33%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.3
Election integrity, single-turn harmful — API, no system promptClaude Mythos 5100%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.3
Election integrity, single-turn harmful — API, no system promptClaude Opus 4.8100%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.3
Election integrity, single-turn benign — API, no system promptClaude Opus 4.80.33%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.3
Election integrity, single-turn harmful — API, no system promptClaude Mythos Preview100%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.3
Election integrity, single-turn harmful — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 4.6100%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.3
Election integrity, single-turn benign — API, no system promptClaude Sonnet 4.60.00%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card4.4.3
Malicious use of Claude Code — Malicious (refusal rate)Claude Sonnet 592.37%61 malicious prompts × 10 runs; Claude Code system prompt, no additional safeguards; developer-reported5.1.1
Malicious use of Claude Code — Dual-use & benign (success rate)Claude Sonnet 591.55%61 prompts × 10 runs; developer-reported5.1.1
Malicious use of Claude Code — Malicious (refusal rate)Claude Mythos 590.25%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.1
Malicious use of Claude Code — Dual-use & benign (success rate)Claude Mythos 599.64%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.1
Malicious use of Claude Code — Malicious (refusal rate)Claude Opus 4.895.24%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card; the Opus 5 card gives 89.42% for the same cell — see Notes5.1.1
Malicious use of Claude Code — Dual-use & benign (success rate)Claude Opus 4.894.84%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card; the Opus 5 card gives 99.82% — see Notes5.1.1
Malicious use of Claude Code — Malicious (refusal rate)Claude Mythos Preview96.21%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.1
Malicious use of Claude Code — Dual-use & benign (success rate)Claude Mythos Preview89.16%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.1
Malicious use of Claude Code — Malicious (refusal rate)Claude Sonnet 4.676.60%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.1
Malicious use of Claude Code — Dual-use & benign (success rate)Claude Sonnet 4.697.33%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.1
Malicious computer use — Refusal rate (no mitigations)Claude Sonnet 584.68%112 tasks; average of thinking and non-thinking for Opus and Sonnet, thinking only for Mythos; developer-reported5.1.2
Malicious computer use — Refusal rate (no mitigations)Claude Mythos 585.71%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.2
Malicious computer use — Refusal rate (no mitigations)Claude Opus 4.881.70%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.2
Malicious computer use — Refusal rate (no mitigations)Claude Mythos Preview93.75%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.2
Malicious computer use — Refusal rate (no mitigations)Claude Sonnet 4.684.82%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.2
Agentic influence campaigns — Voter suppression (task completion rate)Claude Sonnet 550.8%average share of 70 success criteria completed; 3 runs × 3 friction levels per scenario; helpful-only variant; developer-reported5.1.3
Agentic influence campaigns — Domestic polarization (task completion rate)Claude Sonnet 543.3%developer-reported5.1.3
Agentic influence campaigns — Voter suppression (task completion rate)Claude Mythos 567.1%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.3
Agentic influence campaigns — Domestic polarization (task completion rate)Claude Mythos 546.8%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.3
Agentic influence campaigns — Voter suppression (task completion rate)Claude Opus 4.873.3%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.3
Agentic influence campaigns — Domestic polarization (task completion rate)Claude Opus 4.855.1%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.3
Agentic influence campaigns — Voter suppression (task completion rate)Claude Mythos Preview59.5%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.3
Agentic influence campaigns — Domestic polarization (task completion rate)Claude Mythos Preview42.1%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.3
Agentic influence campaigns — Voter suppression (task completion rate)Claude Sonnet 4.641.8%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.3
Agentic influence campaigns — Domestic polarization (task completion rate)Claude Sonnet 4.634.0%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.1.3
Gray Swan prompt-injection bug bounty — Overall attack success rateClaude Sonnet 50.19%one-week live bug bounty, 11 scenarios across tool use, coding and computer use; Claude models at high thinking effort without harness-level defenses or injection probes; external models in production configuration; developer-reported5.2.2.1
Gray Swan prompt-injection bug bounty — Overall attack success rateClaude Opus 4.80.19%tied with Sonnet 5; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.1
Gray Swan prompt-injection bug bounty — Overall attack success rateClaude Sonnet 4.61.41%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.1
Gray Swan prompt-injection bug bounty — Overall attack success rateGPT-5.53.08%high reasoning effort; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.1
Gray Swan prompt-injection bug bounty — Overall attack success rateGemini 3.5 Flash6.66%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.1
Gray Swan prompt-injection bug bounty — Tool useClaude Sonnet 50.35%per-surface breakdown; developer-reported5.2.2.1
Gray Swan prompt-injection bug bounty — CodingClaude Sonnet 50.1%developer-reported5.2.2.1
Gray Swan prompt-injection bug bounty — Computer useClaude Sonnet 50.07%developer-reported5.2.2.1
Gray Swan prompt-injection bug bounty — Tool useClaude Sonnet 4.60.83%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.1
Gray Swan prompt-injection bug bounty — CodingClaude Sonnet 4.63.3%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.1
Gray Swan prompt-injection bug bounty — Computer useClaude Sonnet 4.60.45%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.1
Gray Swan prompt-injection bug bounty — Tool useClaude Opus 4.80%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.1
Gray Swan prompt-injection bug bounty — CodingClaude Opus 4.80.41%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.1
Gray Swan prompt-injection bug bounty — Computer useClaude Opus 4.80.07%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.1
Shade adaptive prompt injection (coding) — Without safeguards, with thinkingClaude Sonnet 50.31%40 scenarios × 200 attempts; attacker trained on a previous set of models and transferred; scenario-level 7/40; developer-reported5.2.2.2
Shade adaptive prompt injection (coding) — Without safeguards, without thinkingClaude Sonnet 50.29%scenario-level 6/40; developer-reported5.2.2.2
Shade adaptive prompt injection (coding) — With safeguards, with thinkingClaude Sonnet 50.09%scenario-level 5/40; developer-reported5.2.2.2
Shade adaptive prompt injection (coding) — With safeguards, without thinkingClaude Sonnet 50.13%scenario-level 5/40; developer-reported5.2.2.2
Shade adaptive prompt injection (coding) — Without safeguards, with thinkingClaude Mythos 50.45%scenario-level 8/40; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.2
Shade adaptive prompt injection (coding) — With safeguards, with thinkingClaude Mythos 50.41%scenario-level 11/40; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.2
Shade adaptive prompt injection (coding) — Without safeguards, with thinkingClaude Opus 4.87.03%scenario-level 23/40; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.2
Shade adaptive prompt injection (coding) — Without safeguards, without thinkingClaude Opus 4.817.44%scenario-level 38/40; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.2
Shade adaptive prompt injection (coding) — With safeguards, with thinkingClaude Opus 4.82.09%scenario-level 15/40; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.2
Shade adaptive prompt injection (coding) — With safeguards, without thinkingClaude Opus 4.84.11%scenario-level 26/40; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.2
Shade adaptive prompt injection (coding) — Without safeguards, with thinkingClaude Sonnet 4.612.71%scenario-level 36/40; Sonnet 4.6 was in the attacker's training set, so the card says its rate is expected to be higher and not directly comparable; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.2
Shade adaptive prompt injection (coding) — Without safeguards, without thinkingClaude Sonnet 4.645.26%scenario-level 40/40; as above5.2.2.2
Shade adaptive prompt injection (coding) — With safeguards, with thinkingClaude Sonnet 4.62.99%scenario-level 32/40; as above5.2.2.2
Shade adaptive prompt injection (coding) — With safeguards, without thinkingClaude Sonnet 4.68.70%scenario-level 40/40; as above5.2.2.2
Shade adaptive prompt injection (computer use) — Without safeguards, with thinkingClaude Sonnet 52.25%14 test cases × 200 attempts; scenario-level 4/14; developer-reported5.2.2.3
Shade adaptive prompt injection (computer use) — Without safeguards, without thinkingClaude Sonnet 56.04%scenario-level 7/14; developer-reported5.2.2.3
Shade adaptive prompt injection (computer use) — With safeguards, with thinkingClaude Sonnet 51.46%scenario-level 4/14; developer-reported5.2.2.3
Shade adaptive prompt injection (computer use) — With safeguards, without thinkingClaude Sonnet 53.82%scenario-level 7/14; developer-reported5.2.2.3
Shade adaptive prompt injection (computer use) — Without safeguards, with thinkingClaude Mythos 50.82%scenario-level 4/14; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.3
Shade adaptive prompt injection (computer use) — With safeguards, with thinkingClaude Mythos 50.46%scenario-level 3/14; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.3
Shade adaptive prompt injection (computer use) — Without safeguards, with thinkingClaude Opus 4.87.14%scenario-level 7/14; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.3
Shade adaptive prompt injection (computer use) — Without safeguards, without thinkingClaude Opus 4.86.21%scenario-level 9/14; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.3
Shade adaptive prompt injection (computer use) — With safeguards, with thinkingClaude Opus 4.85.11%scenario-level 8/14; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.3
Shade adaptive prompt injection (computer use) — With safeguards, without thinkingClaude Opus 4.83.75%scenario-level 9/14; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.3
Shade adaptive prompt injection (computer use) — Without safeguards, with thinkingClaude Sonnet 4.612.0%scenario-level 6/14; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.3
Shade adaptive prompt injection (computer use) — Without safeguards, without thinkingClaude Sonnet 4.614.4%scenario-level 9/14; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.3
Shade adaptive prompt injection (computer use) — With safeguards, with thinkingClaude Sonnet 4.66.21%scenario-level 9/14; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.3
Shade adaptive prompt injection (computer use) — With safeguards, without thinkingClaude Sonnet 4.66.32%scenario-level 11/14; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.3
Browser-use prompt injection (internal adaptive eval) — Without safeguards, with thinkingClaude Sonnet 50.93%129 curated environments never seen in training, 10 attempts per scenario, programmatic checker; scenario-level 9/129; developer-reported5.2.2.4
Browser-use prompt injection (internal adaptive eval) — Without safeguards, without thinkingClaude Sonnet 51.01%scenario-level 7/129; developer-reported5.2.2.4
Browser-use prompt injection (internal adaptive eval) — With safeguards, with thinkingClaude Sonnet 50%scenario-level 0/129; developer-reported5.2.2.4
Browser-use prompt injection (internal adaptive eval) — With safeguards, without thinkingClaude Sonnet 50%scenario-level 0/129; developer-reported5.2.2.4
Browser-use prompt injection (internal adaptive eval) — Without safeguards, with thinkingClaude Mythos 529.7%scenario-level 71/129; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.4
Browser-use prompt injection (internal adaptive eval) — With safeguards, with thinkingClaude Mythos 50%scenario-level 0/129; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.4
Browser-use prompt injection (internal adaptive eval) — Without safeguards, with thinkingClaude Opus 4.831.5%scenario-level 81/129; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.4
Browser-use prompt injection (internal adaptive eval) — Without safeguards, without thinkingClaude Opus 4.817.8%scenario-level 60/129; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.4
Browser-use prompt injection (internal adaptive eval) — With safeguards, with thinkingClaude Opus 4.80.08%scenario-level 1/129; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.4
Browser-use prompt injection (internal adaptive eval) — With safeguards, without thinkingClaude Opus 4.80.08%scenario-level 1/129; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.4
Browser-use prompt injection (internal adaptive eval) — Without safeguards, with thinkingClaude Sonnet 4.650.7%scenario-level 98/129; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.4
Browser-use prompt injection (internal adaptive eval) — Without safeguards, without thinkingClaude Sonnet 4.647.3%scenario-level 99/129; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.4
Browser-use prompt injection (internal adaptive eval) — With safeguards, with thinkingClaude Sonnet 4.61.16%scenario-level 7/129; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.4
Browser-use prompt injection (internal adaptive eval) — With safeguards, without thinkingClaude Sonnet 4.60.39%scenario-level 2/129; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card5.2.2.4
AA-Omniscience — Net score (correct − incorrect)Claude Sonnet 50.20public split, 41 topics, closed book; abstentions score zero; developer-reported6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Net score (correct − incorrect)Claude Opus 4.60.21reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Net score (correct − incorrect)Claude Sonnet 4.60.14reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Net score (correct − incorrect)Claude Opus 4.70.35reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Net score (correct − incorrect)Claude Opus 4.80.37reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Net score (correct − incorrect)Claude Mythos Preview0.50reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Net score (correct − incorrect)Claude Mythos 50.53reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Decline-to-answer rateClaude Sonnet 526.6%highest of the comparison set; developer-reported6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Decline-to-answer rateClaude Mythos 55.7%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Correct rateClaude Sonnet 546.9%lowest correct-rate of the comparison set; developer-reported6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Incorrect rate (hallucination)Claude Sonnet 526.5%the card notes the Sonnet 5 training run was flagged as unhealthy in its second half; developer-reported6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Incorrect rate (hallucination)Claude Opus 4.630.3%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Incorrect rate (hallucination)Claude Sonnet 4.635.0%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Incorrect rate (hallucination)Claude Opus 4.821.2%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Incorrect rate (hallucination)Claude Mythos Preview21.7%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.1
AA-Omniscience — Incorrect rate (hallucination)Claude Mythos 520.9%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.1
MASK — Lying rate (public test split)Claude Sonnet 53.1%n=904; lowest of the models compared, within the confidence interval of Mythos Preview; developer-reported6.5.2
MASK — Lying rate (public test split)Claude Mythos Preview4.4%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.2
MASK — Lying rate (public test split)Claude Opus 4.86.1%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.2
MASK — Lying rate (public test split)Claude Mythos 58.6%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.2
MASK — Lying rate (public test split)Claude Opus 4.69.8%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.2
MASK — Lying rate (public test split)Claude Opus 4.79.8%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.2
MASK — Lying rate (public test split)Claude Sonnet 4.613.3%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card6.5.2
LinuxArena — Stealth success rateClaude Sonnet 50zero under both monitor settings (Opus 4.6 monitor with and without chain-of-thought); every successful side-task attempt was flagged; adaptive extended thinking; developer-reported6.7.2
FrontierCode v1Claude Sonnet 538.8150 tasks created by Cognition; developer-reported8.1; 8.4
FrontierCode v1Claude Sonnet 4.615.1not evaluated at low or xhigh effort; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.1
FrontierCode v1GPT-5.525.5not evaluated at max effort; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.1
CursorBenchClaude Sonnet 561.2%real coding tasks run in Cursor's production agent harness; all scores and per-task costs measured and reported independently by Cursor8.5
CursorBenchClaude Sonnet 4.649%measured by Cursor; reported in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.5
CursorBenchClaude Opus 4.863.8%measured by Cursor; reported in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.5
ProgramBench — Episodes 1–5 (range)Claude Sonnet 576–86%hidden test pass rate across 5 episodes on 166 retained tasks (34 excluded for flaky reference binaries), 1M-token budget per episode; printed as a range; developer-reported8.8
ProgramBench — Episodes 1–5 (range)Claude Sonnet 4.652–74%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.8
ProgramBench — Episodes 1–5 (range)Claude Opus 4.880–90%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.8
ProgramBench — Episodes 1–5 (range)Claude Mythos 584–93%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.8
GDP.pdf — No toolsClaude Sonnet 567.5%mean criteria pass rate over the full 100 prompts, averaged over five runs; internal harness, base64 PDFs truncated at the 32MB API limit, Opus 4.7 as judge; max output tokens raised to 128k; developer-reported8.10.1
GDP.pdf — With toolsClaude Sonnet 581.6%container with the PDF, standard Python libraries and an image-cropping tool; developer-reported8.10.1
GDP.pdf — No toolsClaude Sonnet 4.666.9%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.10.1
GDP.pdf — With toolsClaude Sonnet 4.678.6%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.10.1
BenchCAD Vision2Code — No tools (1,000-file subset)Claude Sonnet 50.266voxel IoU on a random 1,000-file subset of 17,874 Vision2Code files, averaged over five runs; internal implementation with a system-prompt camera-position correction, raw-shape grading, and 26 records omitted; developer-reported8.10.3
BenchCAD Vision2Code — With tools (1,000-file subset)Claude Sonnet 50.373container with image files, standard Python libraries and an image-cropping tool; developer-reported8.10.3
BenchCAD Vision2Code — No tools (1,000-file subset)Claude Sonnet 4.60.267reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.10.3
BenchCAD Vision2Code — With tools (1,000-file subset)Claude Sonnet 4.60.327reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.10.3
ChartMuseum — No toolsClaude Sonnet 570.1%1,162 expert-annotated questions; test split, averaged over five runs; adaptive thinking at max effort; Claude Sonnet 4.6 grader instead of GPT-4.1-mini; developer-reported8.10.4
ChartMuseum — With Python toolsClaude Sonnet 586.7%container with the image file, standard Python libraries and an image-cropping tool; developer-reported8.10.4
ChartMuseum — No toolsClaude Sonnet 4.659.3%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.10.4
ChartMuseum — With Python toolsClaude Sonnet 4.680.9%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.10.4
ChartMuseum — No toolsClaude Opus 4.875.8%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.10.4
ChartMuseum — With Python toolsClaude Opus 4.889.7%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.10.4
OfficeQA — Full setClaude Sonnet 573.3%exact-match, mean of five trials; agentic harness with documents as extracted text and code execution; episodes exhausting the output budget scored incorrect (~9–15% of episodes); adaptive thinking at max effort; developer-reported8.11.1
OfficeQA — Pro (133-question subset)Claude Sonnet 559.4%as above; developer-reported8.11.1
OfficeQA — Full setClaude Sonnet 4.668.7%single trial; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.1
OfficeQA — Pro (133-question subset)Claude Sonnet 4.653.4%single trial; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.1
Real-World Finance v2 — EloClaude Sonnet 51219294 internally developed finance tasks; pairwise comparison by a Claude Opus 4.8 grader, Bradley-Terry fit with Sonnet 4.6, Opus 4.8, Mythos and Fable 5 anchored to published values; developer-reported8.11.2
Real-World Finance v2 — EloClaude Opus 4.71207statistically tied with Sonnet 5; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.2
Real-World Finance v2 — EloClaude Opus 4.81222statistically tied with Sonnet 5; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.2
Real-World Finance v2 — Head-to-head win rateClaude Sonnet 569%Sonnet 5 wins; +219 Elo over Sonnet 4.6; developer-reported8.11.2
Real-World Finance v2 — Head-to-head win rateClaude Fable 569%Fable 5 wins; developer-reported8.11.2
Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) — All-pass rate (Anthropic harness)Claude Sonnet 58.92%± 0.36, n=5; 1,235 of 1,251 problems; adaptive thinking at max effort; internal reimplementation exposing only bash and a Python tool, Sonnet 4.6 as judge; Table 8.1.A prints 8.9; developer-reported8.1; 8.11.3
Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) — Mean criterion-pass rate (Anthropic harness)Claude Sonnet 588.26%as above; developer-reported8.11.3
Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) — All-pass rate (Anthropic harness)Claude Sonnet 4.68.00%± 0.19, n=5; Table 8.1.A prints 8.0; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.1; 8.11.3
Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) — Mean criterion-pass rate (Anthropic harness)Claude Sonnet 4.688.48%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.3
Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) — All-pass rate (Harvey held-out set)Claude Sonnet 55.8%per Harvey's own evaluation on their held-out set8.1; 8.11.3
Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) — Mean criterion-pass rate (Harvey held-out set)Claude Sonnet 591.2%per Harvey's own evaluation on their held-out set8.11.3
Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) — All-pass rate (Harvey held-out set)Claude Sonnet 4.65.4%reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card (Table 8.1.A)8.1
Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) — All-pass rate (Harvey held-out set)GPT-5.52.1reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card (Table 8.1.A)8.1
Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) — All-pass rate (Harvey held-out set)Gemini 3.5 Flash0.8reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card (Table 8.1.A)8.1
Toolathlon — Pass@1 (internal harness)Claude Sonnet 554.3108 tasks, 3 trials; adaptive thinking at max effort; internal harness with pinned data feeds and container images, which the card estimates runs ~3 points above a strictly upstream-equivalent harness; developer-reported8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@3 (internal harness)Claude Sonnet 563.0developer-reported8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass³ (internal harness)Claude Sonnet 540.7developer-reported8.11.5
Toolathlon — Average turns (internal harness)Claude Sonnet 526.0developer-reported8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@1 (internal harness)Claude Fable 561.7reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@3 (internal harness)Claude Fable 568.5reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass³ (internal harness)Claude Fable 555.6reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Average turns (internal harness)Claude Fable 519.8reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@1 (internal harness)Claude Mythos 561.7reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@3 (internal harness)Claude Mythos 566.7reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass³ (internal harness)Claude Mythos 558.3reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Average turns (internal harness)Claude Mythos 519.0reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@1 (internal harness)Claude Opus 4.859.9reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@3 (internal harness)Claude Opus 4.867.6reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass³ (internal harness)Claude Opus 4.848.1reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Average turns (internal harness)Claude Opus 4.824.5reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@1 (internal harness)Claude Opus 4.759.3reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@3 (internal harness)Claude Opus 4.766.7reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass³ (internal harness)Claude Opus 4.752.8reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Average turns (internal harness)Claude Opus 4.725.9reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@1 (internal harness)Claude Mythos Preview61.1reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@3 (internal harness)Claude Mythos Preview66.7reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass³ (internal harness)Claude Mythos Preview55.6reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Average turns (internal harness)Claude Mythos Preview17.6reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@1 (internal harness)Claude Sonnet 4.649.4reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@3 (internal harness)Claude Sonnet 4.660.2reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass³ (internal harness)Claude Sonnet 4.638.0reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Average turns (internal harness)Claude Sonnet 4.616.5reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@1 (internal harness)Claude Opus 4.656.8reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@3 (internal harness)Claude Opus 4.666.7reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass³ (internal harness)Claude Opus 4.647.2reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Average turns (internal harness)Claude Opus 4.616.9reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@1 (internal harness)Claude Sonnet 4.541.0reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass@3 (internal harness)Claude Sonnet 4.554.6reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Pass³ (internal harness)Claude Sonnet 4.528.7reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
Toolathlon — Average turns (internal harness)Claude Sonnet 4.532.0reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.11.5
AutomationBench — Private held-out leaderboardClaude Sonnet 513.5%max effort; Zapier benchmark, simulated company with REST APIs across 47 apps; developer-reported8.1; 8.11.6
AutomationBench — Private held-out leaderboardClaude Sonnet 4.65.3%max effort; reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card8.1; 8.11.6
AutomationBench — Private held-out leaderboardGPT-5.512.9reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card (Table 8.1.A)8.1
AutomationBench — Private held-out leaderboardGemini 3.5 Flash14.5reported by Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet 5 system card (Table 8.1.A)8.1
AA-Briefcase — EloClaude Sonnet 51393long-horizon knowledge work; rubric scoring plus pairwise judging by a panel of frontier models; ranks second; 183 turns on average; evaluation run independently by Artificial Analysis8.11.7
AA-Briefcase — EloClaude Opus 4.81352statistically tied with Sonnet 5; 55 turns on average; run by Artificial Analysis8.11.7
AA-Briefcase — EloClaude Fable 51586leads the leaderboard; 67 turns on average; run by Artificial Analysis8.11.7

Relationships