"Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence" is the technical report that Moonshot AI's Kimi Team released with the full weights of Kimi K3 on July 27, 2026, distributed as a PDF in the model's GitHub repository and linked from its Hugging Face model card (Source: github.com; huggingface.co). It shares a title with the July 16 launch announcement (Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence (Moonshot AI, July 2026)) and supersedes that post's benchmark table with a larger one. The report describes a 2.8T-parameter mixture-of-experts model with 104 billion activated parameters, native vision and a one-million-token context window.
Architecture and training
The report attributes the model's design to two mechanisms from earlier Moonshot papers, Kimi Delta Attention (a hybrid linear attention paired with gated multi-head latent attention) and Attention Residuals, together with Stable LatentMoE, which activates 16 of 896 routed experts per token. Moonshot states that these and revised training and data recipes give about a 2.5-fold improvement in overall scaling efficiency over Kimi K2. Other components described are a SiTU-GLU activation, Quantile Balancing for expert load, a native vision encoder, and a Per-Head Muon optimizer.
Pre-training data spans web text, code, mathematics and knowledge, plus a vision corpus of captions, interleaved documents, OCR, perception, video and visual-coding data; knowledge and mathematics corpora are rephrased following the Kimi K2 recipe. Post-training consists of supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning across general, agentic and coding domains at several reasoning-effort levels, multi-teacher on-policy distillation, and quantization-aware training for MXFP4 weights. Infrastructure sections cover kernels and context parallelism for Kimi Delta Attention, balanced expert-parallel training, one-million-token agentic reinforcement learning with persistent sandbox state, and serving.
Evaluation approach
Public benchmarks are grouped into reasoning and knowledge, coding, agentic, and vision (Table 2). Kimi K3 is run at maximum reasoning effort and temperature 1.0, with top-p 0.95 for single-step tasks and 1.0 for agentic tasks. Baselines are Claude Fable 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5 and GLM-5.2, all at maximum effort except GPT-5.5 at "xhigh". The report states that Claude Fable 5 results "include fallback behaviors" and GPT-5.6 Sol results "include potential cyberguards." Coding models run under Kimi Code, Claude Code or Codex. Several comparison scores are not Moonshot's measurements: the report and model card cite Artificial Analysis (GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, τ³-Banking, Harvey Lab-AA, SciCode, AA-LCR, CritPt), Vals AI, and the official leaderboards for DeepSWE, Agents' Last Exam, Toolathlon-Verified, JobBench and APEX-Agents, dated July 23 or 24, 2026. Moonshot notes departures from official settings, including H20 rather than H100 GPUs for PostTrainBench and SWE-Marathon, and a context-compaction strategy for BrowseComp.
Table 3 reports sixteen in-house benchmarks covering coding, general agent and conversational experience, with footnotes giving the number of tasks on which Claude Fable 5 fell back or refused and GPT-5.6 Sol or GPT-5.5 refused. Table 4 gives blind expert preferences between Kimi K3 and Claude Opus 4.8 on web-development prompts.
A cybersecurity section evaluates two tiers: vulnerability discovery with proof-of-concept development, and end-to-end exploit development on an in-house suite of 36 expert-verified tasks, with GLM-5.2 as the only baseline. Moonshot says Anthropic and OpenAI frontier models refuse such tasks, "making a comparable evaluation infeasible." The section cites the joint UK AI Security Institute and CAISI assessment (UK AISI / CAISI Preliminary Assessment of Kimi K3's Cyber Capabilities (July 2026)) as consistent with its own results. A third-party section (Table 5) cites the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, the Vals Index and Arena leaderboards as of July 23, 2026, and a cost section compares score with per-task cost on four suites.
Findings as stated by Moonshot
The abstract says Kimi K3's overall performance "still trails the most powerful proprietary models, namely Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol," while exceeding the other evaluated models. The report identifies research-level reasoning (Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt) as a remaining gap and lists agentic suites on which it reports the highest score. On the in-house suite it names orchestration, deep research and coding as strengths and agent behaviour, multi-agent routing and agentic vision as areas where the model trails.
On cybersecurity, Moonshot reports that about 70% of human-reviewed vulnerability findings were confirmed, including 16 previously unknown vulnerabilities across six projects, and that the model solved 14 of 36 exploit tasks against 8 for GLM-5.2, with most successes on user-space targets. It describes a "clear gap to human experts" on hardened targets and regards its evaluation as "a lower bound on capability."
Reported results
Evaluation results the document states for which there is no separate benchmark page; results on benchmarks that have a page are recorded there and cite this page. Scores and settings are as printed in the document.
| Evaluation | Model | Score | Setting | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CritPt | Kimi K3 | 23.4 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| CritPt | Claude Fable 5 | 28.6 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| CritPt | GPT-5.6 Sol | 32.3 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| CritPt | Claude Opus 4.8 | 20.9 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| CritPt | GPT-5.5 | 27.1 | effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| CritPt | GLM-5.2 | 20.9 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AA-LCR | Kimi K3 | 74.7 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AA-LCR | Claude Fable 5 | 70.0 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AA-LCR | GPT-5.6 Sol | 73.7 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AA-LCR | Claude Opus 4.8 | 67.7 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AA-LCR | GPT-5.5 | 74.3 | effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AA-LCR | GLM-5.2 | 71.3 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| DeepSWE | Kimi K3 | 67.5 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; DeepSWE v1.1 tasks, Kimi Code harness (67.3 on the official leaderboard with mini-SWE-agent); developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| DeepSWE | Claude Fable 5 | 70.0 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, all others from the official DeepSWE leaderboard; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| DeepSWE | GPT-5.6 Sol | 73.0 | effort 'max'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, all others from the official DeepSWE leaderboard; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| DeepSWE | Claude Opus 4.8 | 59.0 | effort 'max'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, all others from the official DeepSWE leaderboard; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| DeepSWE | GPT-5.5 | 67.0 | effort 'xhigh'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, all others from the official DeepSWE leaderboard; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| DeepSWE | GLM-5.2 | 46.2 | effort 'max'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, all others from the official DeepSWE leaderboard; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ProgramBench | Kimi K3 | 77.8 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; Kimi Code harness; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ProgramBench | Claude Fable 5 | 76.8 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, others from Vals AI (per the model card footnote); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ProgramBench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 77.6 | effort 'max'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, others from Vals AI (per the model card footnote); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ProgramBench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 71.9 | effort 'max'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, others from Vals AI (per the model card footnote); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ProgramBench | GPT-5.5 | 70.8 | effort 'xhigh'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, others from Vals AI (per the model card footnote); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ProgramBench | GLM-5.2 | 63.7 | effort 'max'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, others from Vals AI (per the model card footnote); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| FrontierSWE | Kimi K3 | 81.2 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; dominance score recomputed from raw scores with the official script as of July 16, 2026; Kimi Code harness; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| FrontierSWE | Claude Fable 5 | 86.6 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; dominance score recomputed as of July 16, 2026; GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot with Codex, others from FrontierSWE; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| FrontierSWE | GPT-5.6 Sol | 71.3 | effort 'max'; dominance score recomputed as of July 16, 2026; GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot with Codex, others from FrontierSWE; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| FrontierSWE | Claude Opus 4.8 | 66.7 | effort 'max'; dominance score recomputed as of July 16, 2026; GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot with Codex, others from FrontierSWE; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| FrontierSWE | GPT-5.5 | 64.9 | effort 'xhigh'; dominance score recomputed as of July 16, 2026; GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot with Codex, others from FrontierSWE; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| FrontierSWE | GLM-5.2 | 67.3 | effort 'max'; dominance score recomputed as of July 16, 2026; GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot with Codex, others from FrontierSWE; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SWE-Marathon | Kimi K3 | 42.0 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; H20-calibrated branch of the official tasks as of July 9, 2026 (pre-v1.1); Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SWE-Marathon | Claude Fable 5 | 35.0 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; H20-calibrated branch; Claude models with Claude Code, GPT-5.6 Sol with Codex, GLM-5.2 from its release blog; Claude Fable 5 hit fallbacks on 35% of tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SWE-Marathon | GPT-5.6 Sol | 39.0 | effort 'max'; H20-calibrated branch; Claude models with Claude Code, GPT-5.6 Sol with Codex, GLM-5.2 from its release blog; Claude Fable 5 hit fallbacks on 35% of tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SWE-Marathon | Claude Opus 4.8 | 40.0 | effort 'max'; H20-calibrated branch; Claude models with Claude Code, GPT-5.6 Sol with Codex, GLM-5.2 from its release blog; Claude Fable 5 hit fallbacks on 35% of tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SWE-Marathon | GPT-5.5 | 14.0 | effort 'xhigh'; H20-calibrated branch; Claude models with Claude Code, GPT-5.6 Sol with Codex, GLM-5.2 from its release blog; Claude Fable 5 hit fallbacks on 35% of tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SWE-Marathon | GLM-5.2 | 13.0 | effort 'max'; H20-calibrated branch; Claude models with Claude Code, GPT-5.6 Sol with Codex, GLM-5.2 from its release blog; Claude Fable 5 hit fallbacks on 35% of tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| PostTrainBench | Kimi K3 | 36.6 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; official Harbor implementation, max effort, average of three runs on H20 GPUs (H100 in the official setting), Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| PostTrainBench | Claude Fable 5 | 41.4 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; Kimi K3, Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot on H20 GPUs (3-run average); GLM-5.2, GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 from official PostTrainBench results; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| PostTrainBench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 34.6 | effort 'max'; Kimi K3, Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot on H20 GPUs (3-run average); GLM-5.2, GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 from official PostTrainBench results; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| PostTrainBench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 34.1 | effort 'max'; Kimi K3, Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot on H20 GPUs (3-run average); GLM-5.2, GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 from official PostTrainBench results; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| PostTrainBench | GPT-5.5 | 28.4 | effort 'xhigh'; Kimi K3, Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot on H20 GPUs (3-run average); GLM-5.2, GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 from official PostTrainBench results; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| PostTrainBench | GLM-5.2 | 34.3 | effort 'max'; Kimi K3, Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot on H20 GPUs (3-run average); GLM-5.2, GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 from official PostTrainBench results; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MLS-Bench-Lite | Kimi K3 | 48.3 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; Kimi Code harness; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MLS-Bench-Lite | Claude Fable 5 | 49.9 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MLS-Bench-Lite | GPT-5.6 Sol | 46.2 | effort 'max'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MLS-Bench-Lite | Claude Opus 4.8 | 42.8 | effort 'max'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MLS-Bench-Lite | GPT-5.5 | 35.5 | effort 'xhigh'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MLS-Bench-Lite | GLM-5.2 | 40.4 | effort 'max'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SciCode | Kimi K3 | 58.7 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SciCode | Claude Fable 5 | 60.2 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SciCode | GPT-5.6 Sol | 56.1 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SciCode | Claude Opus 4.8 | 53.5 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SciCode | GPT-5.5 | 56.1 | effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SciCode | GLM-5.2 | 50.5 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| DeepSearchQA (F1) | Kimi K3 | 95.0 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; F1; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| DeepSearchQA (F1) | Claude Fable 5 | 94.2 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; F1; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| DeepSearchQA (F1) | Claude Opus 4.8 | 93.1 | effort 'max'; F1; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ResearchRubrics | Kimi K3 | 76.2 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ResearchRubrics | GPT-5.6 Sol | 73.8 | effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ResearchRubrics | Claude Opus 4.8 | 73.5 | effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ResearchRubrics | GPT-5.5 | 64.0 | effort 'xhigh'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ResearchRubrics | GLM-5.2 | 71.1 | effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Kimi K3 | 76.5 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Claude Fable 5 | 77.9 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Toolathlon-Verified | GPT-5.6 Sol | 74.9 | effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Claude Opus 4.8 | 76.2 | effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Toolathlon-Verified | GPT-5.5 | 73.5 | effort 'xhigh'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Toolathlon-Verified | GLM-5.2 | 59.9 | effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MCPMark-Verified | Kimi K3 | 94.5 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MCPMark-Verified | Claude Fable 5 | 87.4 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MCPMark-Verified | GPT-5.6 Sol | 92.9 | effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MCPMark-Verified | Claude Opus 4.8 | 76.4 | effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MCPMark-Verified | GPT-5.5 | 92.9 | effort 'xhigh'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AutomationBench | Kimi K3 | 30.8 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; 600-task public subset; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AutomationBench | Claude Fable 5 | 29.1 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; 600-task public subset; run by Moonshot; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AutomationBench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 29.7 | effort 'max'; 600-task public subset; run by Moonshot; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AutomationBench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 27.2 | effort 'max'; 600-task public subset; run by Moonshot; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AutomationBench | GPT-5.5 | 22.7 | effort 'xhigh'; 600-task public subset; run by Moonshot; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AutomationBench | GLM-5.2 | 12.9 | effort 'max'; 600-task public subset; run by Moonshot; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| JobBench | Kimi K3 | 54.3 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| JobBench | Claude Fable 5 | 57.4 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| JobBench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 45.4 | effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| JobBench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 48.4 | effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| JobBench | GPT-5.5 | 38.3 | effort 'xhigh'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| JobBench | GLM-5.2 | 43.4 | effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AA-Briefcase (Elo) | Kimi K3 | 1548 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AA-Briefcase (Elo) | Claude Fable 5 | 1583 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AA-Briefcase (Elo) | GPT-5.6 Sol | 1495 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AA-Briefcase (Elo) | Claude Opus 4.8 | 1354 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AA-Briefcase (Elo) | GPT-5.5 | 1158 | effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| AA-Briefcase (Elo) | GLM-5.2 | 1260 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Agents' Last Exam | Kimi K3 | 28.3 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 23, 2026, primary pass-rate metric; Kimi Code harness; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Agents' Last Exam | Claude Fable 5 | 25.7 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 23, 2026; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; † leaderboard entry runs at xhigh effort with 40% of tasks annotated as downgraded; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Agents' Last Exam | GPT-5.6 Sol | 29.6 | effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 23, 2026; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Agents' Last Exam | Claude Opus 4.8 | 27.0 | effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 23, 2026; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Agents' Last Exam | GPT-5.5 | 26.6 | effort 'xhigh'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 23, 2026; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Agents' Last Exam | GLM-5.2 | 20.4 | effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 23, 2026; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| OfficeQA Pro | Kimi K3 | 63.3 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; entire PDF corpus rendered as images; Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| OfficeQA Pro | Claude Fable 5 | 69.9 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; entire PDF corpus rendered as images; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| OfficeQA Pro | GPT-5.6 Sol | 63.2 | effort 'max'; entire PDF corpus rendered as images; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| OfficeQA Pro | Claude Opus 4.8 | 63.9 | effort 'max'; entire PDF corpus rendered as images; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| OfficeQA Pro | GPT-5.5 | 60.9 | effort 'xhigh'; entire PDF corpus rendered as images; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| OfficeQA Pro | GLM-5.2 | 41.4 | effort 'max'; entire PDF corpus rendered as images; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SpreadsheetBench 2 | Kimi K3 | 34.8 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SpreadsheetBench 2 | Claude Fable 5 | 34.7 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SpreadsheetBench 2 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 32.4 | effort 'max'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SpreadsheetBench 2 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 31.6 | effort 'max'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SpreadsheetBench 2 | GPT-5.5 | 29.1 | effort 'xhigh'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SpreadsheetBench 2 | GLM-5.2 | 28.1 | effort 'max'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SaaS-Bench | Kimi K3 | 60.1 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SaaS-Bench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 61.4 | effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SaaS-Bench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 56.1 | effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| SaaS-Bench | GPT-5.5 | 43.8 | effort 'xhigh'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| τ3-Banking | Kimi K3 | 33.4 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| τ3-Banking | Claude Fable 5 | 26.8 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| τ3-Banking | GPT-5.6 Sol | 33.0 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| τ3-Banking | Claude Opus 4.8 | 27.6 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| τ3-Banking | GPT-5.5 | 31.3 | effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| τ3-Banking | GLM-5.2 | 26.8 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Harvey Lab-AA | Kimi K3 | 94.6 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; criterion pass rate; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Harvey Lab-AA | Claude Fable 5 | 93.6 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; criterion pass rate; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Harvey Lab-AA | GPT-5.6 Sol | 87.2 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; criterion pass rate; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Harvey Lab-AA | Claude Opus 4.8 | 91.1 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; criterion pass rate; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Harvey Lab-AA | GPT-5.5 | 86.3 | effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; criterion pass rate; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Harvey Lab-AA | GLM-5.2 | 91.0 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; criterion pass rate; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| CorpFin v2 | Kimi K3 | 71.6 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| CorpFin v2 | Claude Fable 5 | 71.8 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| CorpFin v2 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 64.4 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| CorpFin v2 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 66.7 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| CorpFin v2 | GPT-5.5 | 68.4 | effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| CorpFin v2 | GLM-5.2 | 66.1 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Legal Research Bench | Kimi K3 | 44.2 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Legal Research Bench | Claude Fable 5 | 49.5 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Legal Research Bench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 48.1 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Legal Research Bench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 43.8 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Legal Research Bench | GPT-5.5 | 40.4 | effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Legal Research Bench | GLM-5.2 | 31.3 | effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| WorldVQA ForceAnswer | Kimi K3 | 51.0 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; answer enforced by prompt engineering; average of three runs; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| WorldVQA ForceAnswer | Claude Fable 5 | 56.7 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; answer enforced by prompt engineering; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| WorldVQA ForceAnswer | GPT-5.6 Sol | 41.8 | effort 'max'; answer enforced by prompt engineering; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| WorldVQA ForceAnswer | Claude Opus 4.8 | 39.1 | effort 'max'; answer enforced by prompt engineering; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| WorldVQA ForceAnswer | GPT-5.5 | 38.5 | effort 'xhigh'; answer enforced by prompt engineering; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| OmniDocBench | Kimi K3 | 91.1 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; average of three runs; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| OmniDocBench | Claude Fable 5 | 89.8 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| OmniDocBench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 85.8 | effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| OmniDocBench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 87.9 | effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| OmniDocBench | GPT-5.5 | 89.4 | effort 'xhigh'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| PerceptionBench | Kimi K3 | 58.5 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; Moonshot in-house benchmark; average of three runs; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| PerceptionBench | Claude Fable 5 | 57.2 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; Moonshot in-house benchmark; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| PerceptionBench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 59.7 | effort 'max'; Moonshot in-house benchmark; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| PerceptionBench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 47.2 | effort 'max'; Moonshot in-house benchmark; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| PerceptionBench | GPT-5.5 | 55.8 | effort 'xhigh'; Moonshot in-house benchmark; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MMVU | Kimi K3 | 82.1 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; average of three runs; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MMVU | GPT-5.6 Sol | 81.2 | effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MMVU | Claude Opus 4.8 | 79.2 | effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| MMVU | GPT-5.5 | 81.7 | effort 'xhigh'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| BabyVision w/ Python | Kimi K3 | 85.7 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; with Python tool; average of three runs; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| BabyVision w/ Python | Claude Fable 5 | 90.5 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| BabyVision w/ Python | GPT-5.6 Sol | 88.9 | effort 'max'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| BabyVision w/ Python | Claude Opus 4.8 | 81.2 | effort 'max'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| BabyVision w/ Python | GPT-5.5 | 83.6 | effort 'xhigh'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Math-Vision | Kimi K3 | 94.3 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; no tools; average of three runs; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Math-Vision | Kimi K3 | 97.8 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; with Python tool; average of three runs; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Math-Vision | Claude Fable 5 | 94.8 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; no tools; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Math-Vision | Claude Fable 5 | 98.6 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Math-Vision | GPT-5.6 Sol | 95.8 | effort 'max'; no tools; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Math-Vision | GPT-5.6 Sol | 97.8 | effort 'max'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Math-Vision | Claude Opus 4.8 | 86.7 | effort 'max'; no tools; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Math-Vision | Claude Opus 4.8 | 97.1 | effort 'max'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Math-Vision | GPT-5.5 | 92.2 | effort 'xhigh'; no tools; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| Math-Vision | GPT-5.5 | 96.8 | effort 'xhigh'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ZeroBench-main (pass@5) | Kimi K3 | 23.0 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; pass@5, no tools, five runs per the official setting; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ZeroBench-main (pass@5) | Kimi K3 | 41.0 | reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; pass@5, with Python tool, five runs per the official setting; developer-reported | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ZeroBench-main (pass@5) | Claude Fable 5 | 23.0 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; pass@5, no tools, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ZeroBench-main (pass@5) | Claude Fable 5 | 46.0 | effort 'max, w/ fallback'; pass@5, with Python tool, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ZeroBench-main (pass@5) | GPT-5.6 Sol | 17.0 | effort 'max'; pass@5, no tools, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ZeroBench-main (pass@5) | GPT-5.6 Sol | 35.0 | effort 'max'; pass@5, with Python tool, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ZeroBench-main (pass@5) | Claude Opus 4.8 | 17.0 | effort 'max'; pass@5, no tools, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ZeroBench-main (pass@5) | Claude Opus 4.8 | 34.0 | effort 'max'; pass@5, with Python tool, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ZeroBench-main (pass@5) | GPT-5.5 | 22.0 | effort 'xhigh'; pass@5, no tools, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| ZeroBench-main (pass@5) | GPT-5.5 | 41.0 | effort 'xhigh'; pass@5, with Python tool, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.1.4 Table 2 |
| DeepSWE | Kimi K3 | 67.3 | official DeepSWE leaderboard, mini-SWE-agent harness; cited by Moonshot | 6.1.3 |
| Kimi Code Bench 2.0 | Kimi K3 | 73.7 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Kimi Code Bench 2.0 | Claude Fable 5 | 76.9 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; 13 fallbacks and 1 refusal out of 80 tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Kimi Code Bench 2.0 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 71.7 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Kimi Code Bench 2.0 | GLM-5.2 | 64.2 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Kimi Code Bench 2.0 | Kimi K3 | 72.9 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Kimi Code Bench 2.0 | GPT-5.5 | 66.0 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Kimi Code Bench 2.0 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 64.8 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Codex; effort 'max'; 10 refusals out of 80 tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Kimi Code Bench 2.0 | GPT-5.5 | 69.0 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Codex; effort 'xhigh'; 3 refusals out of 80 tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Coding Experience | Kimi K3 | 59.9 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Coding Experience | Claude Fable 5 | 59.8 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Coding Experience | Claude Opus 4.8 | 58.0 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Coding Experience | GLM-5.2 | 53.3 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Coding Experience | Kimi K3 | 56.6 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Coding Experience | GPT-5.6 Sol | 59.3 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Codex; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Coding Experience | GPT-5.5 | 56.8 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Codex; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| 24/7 ClawBench 2.0 | Kimi K3 | 48.3 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: OpenClaw; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| 24/7 ClawBench 2.0 | Claude Fable 5 | 47.4 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: OpenClaw; effort 'max'; includes 2 tasks that Claude Fable 5 refused to answer; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| 24/7 ClawBench 2.0 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 52.0 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: OpenClaw; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| 24/7 ClawBench 2.0 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 47.2 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: OpenClaw; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| 24/7 ClawBench 2.0 | GPT-5.5 | 48.5 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: OpenClaw; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| 24/7 ClawBench 2.0 | GLM-5.2 | 43.2 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: OpenClaw; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| MIRA Bench | Kimi K3 | 64.1 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: MIRA; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| MIRA Bench | Claude Fable 5 | 72.9 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: MIRA; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| MIRA Bench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 62.2 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: MIRA; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| MIRA Bench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 59.8 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: MIRA; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| MIRA Bench | GPT-5.5 | 54.6 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: MIRA; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| KAET | Kimi K3 | 83.5 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| KAET | GPT-5.6 Sol | 85.4 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| KAET | Claude Opus 4.8 | 78.7 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| KAET | GPT-5.5 | 79.7 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| KAET | GLM-5.2 | 74.7 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| CLIF Bench | Kimi K3 | 52.4 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| CLIF Bench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 50.6 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| CLIF Bench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 48.8 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| CLIF Bench | GPT-5.5 | 52.3 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| CLIF Bench | GLM-5.2 | 39.2 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Agentic Vision Bench | Kimi K3 | 78.3 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Agentic Vision Bench | Claude Fable 5 | 81.1 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Agentic Vision Bench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 82.9 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Agentic Vision Bench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 82.8 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Agentic Vision Bench | GPT-5.5 | 76.9 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Swarm Bench | Kimi K3 | 76.3 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Swarm Bench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 73.2 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Swarm Bench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 72.6 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Swarm Bench | GPT-5.5 | 61.8 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Swarm Bench | GLM-5.2 | 58.5 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Online Experience | Kimi K3 | 77.9 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Online Experience | Claude Fable 5 | 74.2 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; includes 14 tasks that Claude Fable 5 refused to answer; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Online Experience | GPT-5.6 Sol | 84.0 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Online Experience | Claude Opus 4.8 | 69.4 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Online Experience | GPT-5.5 | 73.7 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Online Experience | GLM-5.2 | 64.0 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Deep Research Bench | Kimi K3 | 90.0 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Deep Research Bench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 85.3 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Deep Research Bench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 87.2 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Deep Research Bench | GPT-5.5 | 81.9 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Deep Research Bench | GLM-5.2 | 84.0 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Finance Bench | Kimi K3 | 62.6 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Finance Bench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 62.7 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Finance Bench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 60.7 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Finance Bench | GPT-5.5 | 58.4 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Finance Bench | GLM-5.2 | 55.4 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| KWV Bench | Kimi K3 | 64.7 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| KWV Bench | Claude Fable 5 | 63.6 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| KWV Bench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 66.9 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| KWV Bench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 61.7 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| KWV Bench | GPT-5.5 | 65.8 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| DECK Bench | Kimi K3 | 73.5 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| DECK Bench | Claude Fable 5 | 73.0 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| DECK Bench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 74.7 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| DECK Bench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 66.9 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| DECK Bench | GPT-5.5 | 68.2 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| DECK Bench | GLM-5.2 | 68.6 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Agent Behavior Bench | Kimi K3 | 65.0 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Agent Behavior Bench | Claude Fable 5 | 75.5 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; 6 refusals out of 95 tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Agent Behavior Bench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 76.4 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Agent Behavior Bench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 65.7 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Agent Behavior Bench | GPT-5.5 | 70.1 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Faithfulness | Kimi K3 | 85.5 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; metric is 1 − hallucination rate (higher is better); developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Faithfulness | GPT-5.6 Sol | 84.8 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; metric is 1 − hallucination rate (higher is better); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Faithfulness | Claude Opus 4.8 | 83.6 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; metric is 1 − hallucination rate (higher is better); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Faithfulness | GPT-5.5 | 86.5 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'xhigh'; metric is 1 − hallucination rate (higher is better); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Faithfulness | GLM-5.2 | 74.8 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; metric is 1 − hallucination rate (higher is better); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Chat All-in-One Bench | Kimi K3 | 85.2 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Chat All-in-One Bench | Claude Fable 5 | 88.0 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Chat All-in-One Bench | GPT-5.6 Sol | 79.0 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Chat All-in-One Bench | Claude Opus 4.8 | 83.8 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Chat All-in-One Bench | GPT-5.5 | 71.8 | Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.1 Table 3 |
| Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — Games | Kimi K3 | 55.6% | share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'win' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 4 |
| Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — Games | Kimi K3 | 3.7% | share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'tie' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 4 |
| Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — Games | Kimi K3 | 40.7% | share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'lose' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 4 |
| Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — 3D/WebGL/Shader | Kimi K3 | 72.7% | share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'win' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 4 |
| Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — 3D/WebGL/Shader | Kimi K3 | 13.7% | share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'tie' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 4 |
| Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — 3D/WebGL/Shader | Kimi K3 | 13.6% | share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'lose' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 4 |
| Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — Website/UI Clone | Kimi K3 | 52.6% | share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'win' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 4 |
| Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — Website/UI Clone | Kimi K3 | 21.1% | share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'tie' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 4 |
| Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — Website/UI Clone | Kimi K3 | 26.3% | share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'lose' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 4 |
| Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — Overall | Kimi K3 | 58.6% | share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'win' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 4 |
| Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — Overall | Kimi K3 | 13.8% | share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'tie' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 4 |
| Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — Overall | Kimi K3 | 27.6% | share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'lose' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported | 6.2.1 Table 4 |
| In-house exploit-development suite (Tier 2) — All 36 tasks | Kimi K3 | 14 / 36 | 36 expert-verified tasks (16 user-space, 20 Linux kernel); report also prints 38.9%; 10 of the 14 solved tasks are user-space; developer-reported | 6.2.2 |
| In-house exploit-development suite (Tier 2) — All 36 tasks | GLM-5.2 | 8 / 36 | 36 expert-verified tasks; report also prints 22.2%; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.2 |
| In-house exploit-development suite (Tier 2) — Human expert effort | Human security experts | 540 expert-hours | Moonshot's estimate to complete the full suite, about 15 hours per task; every task verified solvable by human experts | 6.2.2 |
| In-house vulnerability discovery (Tier 1) | Kimi K3 | approximately 70% | share of human-reviewed candidate findings confirmed as genuine; includes 16 previously unknown vulnerabilities across six projects; developer-reported | 6.2.2 |
| 32-step simulated enterprise network (UK AISI / CAISI) | Kimi K3 | 17 steps | measured by UK AISI and NIST CAISI (joint assessment), cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report; range takes a human expert roughly 20 hours | 6.2.2 |
| 32-step simulated enterprise network (UK AISI / CAISI) | GLM-5.2 | 11 steps | measured by UK AISI and NIST CAISI (joint assessment), cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.2.2 |
| Vals Index | Kimi K3 | 74.7% | measured by Vals AI; effort 'max'; Kimi K3 ranked #2 of 39; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.3 Table 5 |
| Vals Index | Claude Fable 5 | 75.1% | measured by Vals AI; effort 'max'; Kimi K3 ranked #2 of 39; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.3 Table 5 |
| Vals Index | GPT-5.6 Sol | 73.1% | measured by Vals AI; effort 'max'; Kimi K3 ranked #2 of 39; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.3 Table 5 |
| Vals Index | Claude Opus 4.8 | 70.4 | measured by Vals AI; effort 'max'; Kimi K3 ranked #2 of 39; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.3 Table 5 |
| Vals Index | GPT-5.5 | 68.0 | measured by Vals AI; effort 'xhigh'; Kimi K3 ranked #2 of 39; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.3 Table 5 |
| Vals Index | GLM-5.2 | 65.0 | measured by Vals AI; effort 'max'; Kimi K3 ranked #2 of 39; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.3 Table 5 |
| Agent Arena | Kimi K3 | 9.1 | Arena; opened for voting around July 19, 2026; Kimi K3 ranked #4 of 37; unit not stated; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.3 and Table 5 |
| Agent Arena | Claude Fable 5 | 12.7 | Arena; opened for voting around July 19, 2026; Kimi K3 ranked #4 of 37; unit not stated; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.3 and Table 5 |
| Agent Arena | GPT-5.6 Sol | 10.1 | Arena; opened for voting around July 19, 2026; Kimi K3 ranked #4 of 37; unit not stated; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.3 and Table 5 |
| Agent Arena | Claude Opus 4.8 | 9.8 | Arena; opened for voting around July 19, 2026; Kimi K3 ranked #4 of 37; unit not stated; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.3 and Table 5 |
| Agent Arena | GLM-5.2 | 8.8 | Arena; opened for voting around July 19, 2026; Kimi K3 ranked #4 of 37; unit not stated; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report | 6.3 and Table 5 |
| BrowseComp cost per task | Kimi K3 | $2.03 per task | cost of Moonshot's own BrowseComp run at 91.2%; stated as half the cost of GPT-5.6 Sol; developer-reported | 6.4 |
Provenance
The raw file is a text parse of the PDF, captured on September 19, 2026; the title page parses without a date, and the date used is that of the weights-and-report release. Multi-line table cells parse imperfectly, and the Hugging Face model card provides a clean copy of Table 2 with per-benchmark sourcing footnotes. The report contains no refusal, jailbreak or other safeguard evaluations of Kimi K3. Confidence is medium: the results are developer-reported or developer-selected third-party figures, and several differ from the launch announcement's table published eleven days earlier.
Relationships
- supports: Kimi K3 — primary technical reference
- supersedes: Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence (Moonshot AI, July 2026) — for the benchmark table only; the announcement remains the launch record
- related: Kimi K2 Technical Report — predecessor report
- related: UK AISI / CAISI Preliminary Assessment of Kimi K3's Cyber Capabilities (July 2026) — third-party cyber assessment the report cites