AI Policy Wiki
Dashboard
⚲

Kimi K3 Technical Report (Moonshot AI, July 2026)

medium confidence · updated 2026-09-19

Moonshot AI's technical report for Kimi K3, a 2.8T-parameter mixture-of-experts model with 104B activated parameters, native vision and a one-million-token context. Describes Kimi Delta Attention, Attention Residuals and Stable LatentMoE, and reports public-benchmark, in-house, cybersecurity and third-party evaluations against Claude Fable 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5 and GLM-5.2.

"Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence" is the technical report that Moonshot AI's Kimi Team released with the full weights of Kimi K3 on July 27, 2026, distributed as a PDF in the model's GitHub repository and linked from its Hugging Face model card (Source: github.com; huggingface.co). It shares a title with the July 16 launch announcement (Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence (Moonshot AI, July 2026)) and supersedes that post's benchmark table with a larger one. The report describes a 2.8T-parameter mixture-of-experts model with 104 billion activated parameters, native vision and a one-million-token context window.

Architecture and training

The report attributes the model's design to two mechanisms from earlier Moonshot papers, Kimi Delta Attention (a hybrid linear attention paired with gated multi-head latent attention) and Attention Residuals, together with Stable LatentMoE, which activates 16 of 896 routed experts per token. Moonshot states that these and revised training and data recipes give about a 2.5-fold improvement in overall scaling efficiency over Kimi K2. Other components described are a SiTU-GLU activation, Quantile Balancing for expert load, a native vision encoder, and a Per-Head Muon optimizer.

Pre-training data spans web text, code, mathematics and knowledge, plus a vision corpus of captions, interleaved documents, OCR, perception, video and visual-coding data; knowledge and mathematics corpora are rephrased following the Kimi K2 recipe. Post-training consists of supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning across general, agentic and coding domains at several reasoning-effort levels, multi-teacher on-policy distillation, and quantization-aware training for MXFP4 weights. Infrastructure sections cover kernels and context parallelism for Kimi Delta Attention, balanced expert-parallel training, one-million-token agentic reinforcement learning with persistent sandbox state, and serving.

Evaluation approach

Public benchmarks are grouped into reasoning and knowledge, coding, agentic, and vision (Table 2). Kimi K3 is run at maximum reasoning effort and temperature 1.0, with top-p 0.95 for single-step tasks and 1.0 for agentic tasks. Baselines are Claude Fable 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5 and GLM-5.2, all at maximum effort except GPT-5.5 at "xhigh". The report states that Claude Fable 5 results "include fallback behaviors" and GPT-5.6 Sol results "include potential cyberguards." Coding models run under Kimi Code, Claude Code or Codex. Several comparison scores are not Moonshot's measurements: the report and model card cite Artificial Analysis (GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, τ³-Banking, Harvey Lab-AA, SciCode, AA-LCR, CritPt), Vals AI, and the official leaderboards for DeepSWE, Agents' Last Exam, Toolathlon-Verified, JobBench and APEX-Agents, dated July 23 or 24, 2026. Moonshot notes departures from official settings, including H20 rather than H100 GPUs for PostTrainBench and SWE-Marathon, and a context-compaction strategy for BrowseComp.

Table 3 reports sixteen in-house benchmarks covering coding, general agent and conversational experience, with footnotes giving the number of tasks on which Claude Fable 5 fell back or refused and GPT-5.6 Sol or GPT-5.5 refused. Table 4 gives blind expert preferences between Kimi K3 and Claude Opus 4.8 on web-development prompts.

A cybersecurity section evaluates two tiers: vulnerability discovery with proof-of-concept development, and end-to-end exploit development on an in-house suite of 36 expert-verified tasks, with GLM-5.2 as the only baseline. Moonshot says Anthropic and OpenAI frontier models refuse such tasks, "making a comparable evaluation infeasible." The section cites the joint UK AI Security Institute and CAISI assessment (UK AISI / CAISI Preliminary Assessment of Kimi K3's Cyber Capabilities (July 2026)) as consistent with its own results. A third-party section (Table 5) cites the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, the Vals Index and Arena leaderboards as of July 23, 2026, and a cost section compares score with per-task cost on four suites.

Findings as stated by Moonshot

The abstract says Kimi K3's overall performance "still trails the most powerful proprietary models, namely Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol," while exceeding the other evaluated models. The report identifies research-level reasoning (Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt) as a remaining gap and lists agentic suites on which it reports the highest score. On the in-house suite it names orchestration, deep research and coding as strengths and agent behaviour, multi-agent routing and agentic vision as areas where the model trails.

On cybersecurity, Moonshot reports that about 70% of human-reviewed vulnerability findings were confirmed, including 16 previously unknown vulnerabilities across six projects, and that the model solved 14 of 36 exploit tasks against 8 for GLM-5.2, with most successes on user-space targets. It describes a "clear gap to human experts" on hardened targets and regards its evaluation as "a lower bound on capability."

Reported results

Evaluation results the document states for which there is no separate benchmark page; results on benchmarks that have a page are recorded there and cite this page. Scores and settings are as printed in the document.

EvaluationModelScoreSettingSection
CritPtKimi K323.4reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
CritPtClaude Fable 528.6effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
CritPtGPT-5.6 Sol32.3effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
CritPtClaude Opus 4.820.9effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
CritPtGPT-5.527.1effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
CritPtGLM-5.220.9effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AA-LCRKimi K374.7reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
AA-LCRClaude Fable 570.0effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AA-LCRGPT-5.6 Sol73.7effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AA-LCRClaude Opus 4.867.7effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AA-LCRGPT-5.574.3effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AA-LCRGLM-5.271.3effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
DeepSWEKimi K367.5reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; DeepSWE v1.1 tasks, Kimi Code harness (67.3 on the official leaderboard with mini-SWE-agent); developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
DeepSWEClaude Fable 570.0effort 'max, w/ fallback'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, all others from the official DeepSWE leaderboard; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
DeepSWEGPT-5.6 Sol73.0effort 'max'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, all others from the official DeepSWE leaderboard; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
DeepSWEClaude Opus 4.859.0effort 'max'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, all others from the official DeepSWE leaderboard; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
DeepSWEGPT-5.567.0effort 'xhigh'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, all others from the official DeepSWE leaderboard; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
DeepSWEGLM-5.246.2effort 'max'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, all others from the official DeepSWE leaderboard; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ProgramBenchKimi K377.8reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; Kimi Code harness; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
ProgramBenchClaude Fable 576.8effort 'max, w/ fallback'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, others from Vals AI (per the model card footnote); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ProgramBenchGPT-5.6 Sol77.6effort 'max'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, others from Vals AI (per the model card footnote); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ProgramBenchClaude Opus 4.871.9effort 'max'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, others from Vals AI (per the model card footnote); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ProgramBenchGPT-5.570.8effort 'xhigh'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, others from Vals AI (per the model card footnote); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ProgramBenchGLM-5.263.7effort 'max'; GLM-5.2 from the GLM-5.2 release blog, others from Vals AI (per the model card footnote); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
FrontierSWEKimi K381.2reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; dominance score recomputed from raw scores with the official script as of July 16, 2026; Kimi Code harness; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
FrontierSWEClaude Fable 586.6effort 'max, w/ fallback'; dominance score recomputed as of July 16, 2026; GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot with Codex, others from FrontierSWE; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
FrontierSWEGPT-5.6 Sol71.3effort 'max'; dominance score recomputed as of July 16, 2026; GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot with Codex, others from FrontierSWE; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
FrontierSWEClaude Opus 4.866.7effort 'max'; dominance score recomputed as of July 16, 2026; GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot with Codex, others from FrontierSWE; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
FrontierSWEGPT-5.564.9effort 'xhigh'; dominance score recomputed as of July 16, 2026; GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot with Codex, others from FrontierSWE; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
FrontierSWEGLM-5.267.3effort 'max'; dominance score recomputed as of July 16, 2026; GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot with Codex, others from FrontierSWE; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SWE-MarathonKimi K342.0reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; H20-calibrated branch of the official tasks as of July 9, 2026 (pre-v1.1); Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
SWE-MarathonClaude Fable 535.0effort 'max, w/ fallback'; H20-calibrated branch; Claude models with Claude Code, GPT-5.6 Sol with Codex, GLM-5.2 from its release blog; Claude Fable 5 hit fallbacks on 35% of tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SWE-MarathonGPT-5.6 Sol39.0effort 'max'; H20-calibrated branch; Claude models with Claude Code, GPT-5.6 Sol with Codex, GLM-5.2 from its release blog; Claude Fable 5 hit fallbacks on 35% of tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SWE-MarathonClaude Opus 4.840.0effort 'max'; H20-calibrated branch; Claude models with Claude Code, GPT-5.6 Sol with Codex, GLM-5.2 from its release blog; Claude Fable 5 hit fallbacks on 35% of tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SWE-MarathonGPT-5.514.0effort 'xhigh'; H20-calibrated branch; Claude models with Claude Code, GPT-5.6 Sol with Codex, GLM-5.2 from its release blog; Claude Fable 5 hit fallbacks on 35% of tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SWE-MarathonGLM-5.213.0effort 'max'; H20-calibrated branch; Claude models with Claude Code, GPT-5.6 Sol with Codex, GLM-5.2 from its release blog; Claude Fable 5 hit fallbacks on 35% of tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
PostTrainBenchKimi K336.6reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; official Harbor implementation, max effort, average of three runs on H20 GPUs (H100 in the official setting), Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
PostTrainBenchClaude Fable 541.4effort 'max, w/ fallback'; Kimi K3, Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot on H20 GPUs (3-run average); GLM-5.2, GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 from official PostTrainBench results; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
PostTrainBenchGPT-5.6 Sol34.6effort 'max'; Kimi K3, Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot on H20 GPUs (3-run average); GLM-5.2, GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 from official PostTrainBench results; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
PostTrainBenchClaude Opus 4.834.1effort 'max'; Kimi K3, Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot on H20 GPUs (3-run average); GLM-5.2, GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 from official PostTrainBench results; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
PostTrainBenchGPT-5.528.4effort 'xhigh'; Kimi K3, Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot on H20 GPUs (3-run average); GLM-5.2, GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 from official PostTrainBench results; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
PostTrainBenchGLM-5.234.3effort 'max'; Kimi K3, Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol run by Moonshot on H20 GPUs (3-run average); GLM-5.2, GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 from official PostTrainBench results; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
MLS-Bench-LiteKimi K348.3reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; Kimi Code harness; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
MLS-Bench-LiteClaude Fable 549.9effort 'max, w/ fallback'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
MLS-Bench-LiteGPT-5.6 Sol46.2effort 'max'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
MLS-Bench-LiteClaude Opus 4.842.8effort 'max'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
MLS-Bench-LiteGPT-5.535.5effort 'xhigh'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
MLS-Bench-LiteGLM-5.240.4effort 'max'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SciCodeKimi K358.7reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
SciCodeClaude Fable 560.2effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SciCodeGPT-5.6 Sol56.1effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SciCodeClaude Opus 4.853.5effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SciCodeGPT-5.556.1effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SciCodeGLM-5.250.5effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
DeepSearchQA (F1)Kimi K395.0reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; F1; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
DeepSearchQA (F1)Claude Fable 594.2effort 'max, w/ fallback'; F1; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
DeepSearchQA (F1)Claude Opus 4.893.1effort 'max'; F1; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ResearchRubricsKimi K376.2reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
ResearchRubricsGPT-5.6 Sol73.8effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ResearchRubricsClaude Opus 4.873.5effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ResearchRubricsGPT-5.564.0effort 'xhigh'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ResearchRubricsGLM-5.271.1effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Toolathlon-VerifiedKimi K376.5reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
Toolathlon-VerifiedClaude Fable 577.9effort 'max, w/ fallback'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Toolathlon-VerifiedGPT-5.6 Sol74.9effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Toolathlon-VerifiedClaude Opus 4.876.2effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Toolathlon-VerifiedGPT-5.573.5effort 'xhigh'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Toolathlon-VerifiedGLM-5.259.9effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
MCPMark-VerifiedKimi K394.5reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
MCPMark-VerifiedClaude Fable 587.4effort 'max, w/ fallback'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
MCPMark-VerifiedGPT-5.6 Sol92.9effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
MCPMark-VerifiedClaude Opus 4.876.4effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
MCPMark-VerifiedGPT-5.592.9effort 'xhigh'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AutomationBenchKimi K330.8reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; 600-task public subset; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
AutomationBenchClaude Fable 529.1effort 'max, w/ fallback'; 600-task public subset; run by Moonshot; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AutomationBenchGPT-5.6 Sol29.7effort 'max'; 600-task public subset; run by Moonshot; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AutomationBenchClaude Opus 4.827.2effort 'max'; 600-task public subset; run by Moonshot; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AutomationBenchGPT-5.522.7effort 'xhigh'; 600-task public subset; run by Moonshot; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AutomationBenchGLM-5.212.9effort 'max'; 600-task public subset; run by Moonshot; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
JobBenchKimi K354.3reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
JobBenchClaude Fable 557.4effort 'max, w/ fallback'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
JobBenchGPT-5.6 Sol45.4effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
JobBenchClaude Opus 4.848.4effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
JobBenchGPT-5.538.3effort 'xhigh'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
JobBenchGLM-5.243.4effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 24, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AA-Briefcase (Elo)Kimi K31548reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
AA-Briefcase (Elo)Claude Fable 51583effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AA-Briefcase (Elo)GPT-5.6 Sol1495effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AA-Briefcase (Elo)Claude Opus 4.81354effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AA-Briefcase (Elo)GPT-5.51158effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
AA-Briefcase (Elo)GLM-5.21260effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Agents' Last ExamKimi K328.3reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 23, 2026, primary pass-rate metric; Kimi Code harness; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
Agents' Last ExamClaude Fable 525.7effort 'max, w/ fallback'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 23, 2026; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; † leaderboard entry runs at xhigh effort with 40% of tasks annotated as downgraded; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Agents' Last ExamGPT-5.6 Sol29.6effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 23, 2026; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Agents' Last ExamClaude Opus 4.827.0effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 23, 2026; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Agents' Last ExamGPT-5.526.6effort 'xhigh'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 23, 2026; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Agents' Last ExamGLM-5.220.4effort 'max'; cited from the official leaderboard as of July 23, 2026; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
OfficeQA ProKimi K363.3reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; entire PDF corpus rendered as images; Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
OfficeQA ProClaude Fable 569.9effort 'max, w/ fallback'; entire PDF corpus rendered as images; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
OfficeQA ProGPT-5.6 Sol63.2effort 'max'; entire PDF corpus rendered as images; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
OfficeQA ProClaude Opus 4.863.9effort 'max'; entire PDF corpus rendered as images; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
OfficeQA ProGPT-5.560.9effort 'xhigh'; entire PDF corpus rendered as images; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
OfficeQA ProGLM-5.241.4effort 'max'; entire PDF corpus rendered as images; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SpreadsheetBench 2Kimi K334.8reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
SpreadsheetBench 2Claude Fable 534.7effort 'max, w/ fallback'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SpreadsheetBench 2GPT-5.6 Sol32.4effort 'max'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SpreadsheetBench 2Claude Opus 4.831.6effort 'max'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SpreadsheetBench 2GPT-5.529.1effort 'xhigh'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SpreadsheetBench 2GLM-5.228.1effort 'max'; Claude models and GLM-5.2 with Claude Code, GPT models with Codex; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SaaS-BenchKimi K360.1reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
SaaS-BenchGPT-5.6 Sol61.4effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SaaS-BenchClaude Opus 4.856.1effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
SaaS-BenchGPT-5.543.8effort 'xhigh'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
τ3-BankingKimi K333.4reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
τ3-BankingClaude Fable 526.8effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
τ3-BankingGPT-5.6 Sol33.0effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
τ3-BankingClaude Opus 4.827.6effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
τ3-BankingGPT-5.531.3effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
τ3-BankingGLM-5.226.8effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Harvey Lab-AAKimi K394.6reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; criterion pass rate; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
Harvey Lab-AAClaude Fable 593.6effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; criterion pass rate; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Harvey Lab-AAGPT-5.6 Sol87.2effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; criterion pass rate; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Harvey Lab-AAClaude Opus 4.891.1effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; criterion pass rate; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Harvey Lab-AAGPT-5.586.3effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; criterion pass rate; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Harvey Lab-AAGLM-5.291.0effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Artificial Analysis as of July 23, 2026; criterion pass rate; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
CorpFin v2Kimi K371.6reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
CorpFin v2Claude Fable 571.8effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
CorpFin v2GPT-5.6 Sol64.4effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
CorpFin v2Claude Opus 4.866.7effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
CorpFin v2GPT-5.568.4effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
CorpFin v2GLM-5.266.1effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Legal Research BenchKimi K344.2reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
Legal Research BenchClaude Fable 549.5effort 'max, w/ fallback'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Legal Research BenchGPT-5.6 Sol48.1effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Legal Research BenchClaude Opus 4.843.8effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Legal Research BenchGPT-5.540.4effort 'xhigh'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Legal Research BenchGLM-5.231.3effort 'max'; score cited by Moonshot from Vals AI; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
WorldVQA ForceAnswerKimi K351.0reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; answer enforced by prompt engineering; average of three runs; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
WorldVQA ForceAnswerClaude Fable 556.7effort 'max, w/ fallback'; answer enforced by prompt engineering; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
WorldVQA ForceAnswerGPT-5.6 Sol41.8effort 'max'; answer enforced by prompt engineering; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
WorldVQA ForceAnswerClaude Opus 4.839.1effort 'max'; answer enforced by prompt engineering; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
WorldVQA ForceAnswerGPT-5.538.5effort 'xhigh'; answer enforced by prompt engineering; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
OmniDocBenchKimi K391.1reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; average of three runs; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
OmniDocBenchClaude Fable 589.8effort 'max, w/ fallback'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
OmniDocBenchGPT-5.6 Sol85.8effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
OmniDocBenchClaude Opus 4.887.9effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
OmniDocBenchGPT-5.589.4effort 'xhigh'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
PerceptionBenchKimi K358.5reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; Moonshot in-house benchmark; average of three runs; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
PerceptionBenchClaude Fable 557.2effort 'max, w/ fallback'; Moonshot in-house benchmark; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
PerceptionBenchGPT-5.6 Sol59.7effort 'max'; Moonshot in-house benchmark; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
PerceptionBenchClaude Opus 4.847.2effort 'max'; Moonshot in-house benchmark; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
PerceptionBenchGPT-5.555.8effort 'xhigh'; Moonshot in-house benchmark; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
MMVUKimi K382.1reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; average of three runs; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
MMVUGPT-5.6 Sol81.2effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
MMVUClaude Opus 4.879.2effort 'max'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
MMVUGPT-5.581.7effort 'xhigh'; source of comparison figure not stated in the report; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
BabyVision w/ PythonKimi K385.7reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; with Python tool; average of three runs; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
BabyVision w/ PythonClaude Fable 590.5effort 'max, w/ fallback'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
BabyVision w/ PythonGPT-5.6 Sol88.9effort 'max'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
BabyVision w/ PythonClaude Opus 4.881.2effort 'max'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
BabyVision w/ PythonGPT-5.583.6effort 'xhigh'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Math-VisionKimi K394.3reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; no tools; average of three runs; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
Math-VisionKimi K397.8reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; with Python tool; average of three runs; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
Math-VisionClaude Fable 594.8effort 'max, w/ fallback'; no tools; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Math-VisionClaude Fable 598.6effort 'max, w/ fallback'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Math-VisionGPT-5.6 Sol95.8effort 'max'; no tools; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Math-VisionGPT-5.6 Sol97.8effort 'max'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Math-VisionClaude Opus 4.886.7effort 'max'; no tools; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Math-VisionClaude Opus 4.897.1effort 'max'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Math-VisionGPT-5.592.2effort 'xhigh'; no tools; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
Math-VisionGPT-5.596.8effort 'xhigh'; with Python tool; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ZeroBench-main (pass@5)Kimi K323.0reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; pass@5, no tools, five runs per the official setting; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
ZeroBench-main (pass@5)Kimi K341.0reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0; pass@5, with Python tool, five runs per the official setting; developer-reported6.1.4 Table 2
ZeroBench-main (pass@5)Claude Fable 523.0effort 'max, w/ fallback'; pass@5, no tools, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ZeroBench-main (pass@5)Claude Fable 546.0effort 'max, w/ fallback'; pass@5, with Python tool, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ZeroBench-main (pass@5)GPT-5.6 Sol17.0effort 'max'; pass@5, no tools, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ZeroBench-main (pass@5)GPT-5.6 Sol35.0effort 'max'; pass@5, with Python tool, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ZeroBench-main (pass@5)Claude Opus 4.817.0effort 'max'; pass@5, no tools, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ZeroBench-main (pass@5)Claude Opus 4.834.0effort 'max'; pass@5, with Python tool, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ZeroBench-main (pass@5)GPT-5.522.0effort 'xhigh'; pass@5, no tools, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
ZeroBench-main (pass@5)GPT-5.541.0effort 'xhigh'; pass@5, with Python tool, five runs per the official setting; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.1.4 Table 2
DeepSWEKimi K367.3official DeepSWE leaderboard, mini-SWE-agent harness; cited by Moonshot6.1.3
Kimi Code Bench 2.0Kimi K373.7Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
Kimi Code Bench 2.0Claude Fable 576.9Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; 13 fallbacks and 1 refusal out of 80 tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Kimi Code Bench 2.0Claude Opus 4.871.7Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Kimi Code Bench 2.0GLM-5.264.2Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Kimi Code Bench 2.0Kimi K372.9Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
Kimi Code Bench 2.0GPT-5.566.0Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Kimi Code Bench 2.0GPT-5.6 Sol64.8Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Codex; effort 'max'; 10 refusals out of 80 tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Kimi Code Bench 2.0GPT-5.569.0Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Codex; effort 'xhigh'; 3 refusals out of 80 tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Coding ExperienceKimi K359.9Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
Coding ExperienceClaude Fable 559.8Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Coding ExperienceClaude Opus 4.858.0Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Coding ExperienceGLM-5.253.3Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Claude Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Coding ExperienceKimi K356.6Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
Coding ExperienceGPT-5.6 Sol59.3Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Codex; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Coding ExperienceGPT-5.556.8Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Codex; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
24/7 ClawBench 2.0Kimi K348.3Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: OpenClaw; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
24/7 ClawBench 2.0Claude Fable 547.4Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: OpenClaw; effort 'max'; includes 2 tasks that Claude Fable 5 refused to answer; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
24/7 ClawBench 2.0GPT-5.6 Sol52.0Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: OpenClaw; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
24/7 ClawBench 2.0Claude Opus 4.847.2Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: OpenClaw; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
24/7 ClawBench 2.0GPT-5.548.5Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: OpenClaw; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
24/7 ClawBench 2.0GLM-5.243.2Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: OpenClaw; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
MIRA BenchKimi K364.1Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: MIRA; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
MIRA BenchClaude Fable 572.9Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: MIRA; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
MIRA BenchGPT-5.6 Sol62.2Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: MIRA; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
MIRA BenchClaude Opus 4.859.8Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: MIRA; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
MIRA BenchGPT-5.554.6Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: MIRA; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
KAETKimi K383.5Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
KAETGPT-5.6 Sol85.4Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
KAETClaude Opus 4.878.7Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
KAETGPT-5.579.7Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
KAETGLM-5.274.7Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
CLIF BenchKimi K352.4Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
CLIF BenchGPT-5.6 Sol50.6Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
CLIF BenchClaude Opus 4.848.8Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
CLIF BenchGPT-5.552.3Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
CLIF BenchGLM-5.239.2Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Agentic Vision BenchKimi K378.3Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
Agentic Vision BenchClaude Fable 581.1Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Agentic Vision BenchGPT-5.6 Sol82.9Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Agentic Vision BenchClaude Opus 4.882.8Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Agentic Vision BenchGPT-5.576.9Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Code; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Swarm BenchKimi K376.3Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
Swarm BenchGPT-5.6 Sol73.2Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Swarm BenchClaude Opus 4.872.6Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Swarm BenchGPT-5.561.8Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Swarm BenchGLM-5.258.5Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Online ExperienceKimi K377.9Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
Online ExperienceClaude Fable 574.2Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; includes 14 tasks that Claude Fable 5 refused to answer; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Online ExperienceGPT-5.6 Sol84.0Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Online ExperienceClaude Opus 4.869.4Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Online ExperienceGPT-5.573.7Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Online ExperienceGLM-5.264.0Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Deep Research BenchKimi K390.0Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
Deep Research BenchGPT-5.6 Sol85.3Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Deep Research BenchClaude Opus 4.887.2Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Deep Research BenchGPT-5.581.9Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Deep Research BenchGLM-5.284.0Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Agent; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Finance BenchKimi K362.6Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
Finance BenchGPT-5.6 Sol62.7Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Finance BenchClaude Opus 4.860.7Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Finance BenchGPT-5.558.4Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Finance BenchGLM-5.255.4Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
KWV BenchKimi K364.7Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
KWV BenchClaude Fable 563.6Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
KWV BenchGPT-5.6 Sol66.9Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
KWV BenchClaude Opus 4.861.7Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
KWV BenchGPT-5.565.8Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
DECK BenchKimi K373.5Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
DECK BenchClaude Fable 573.0Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
DECK BenchGPT-5.6 Sol74.7Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
DECK BenchClaude Opus 4.866.9Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
DECK BenchGPT-5.568.2Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
DECK BenchGLM-5.268.6Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Agent Behavior BenchKimi K365.0Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
Agent Behavior BenchClaude Fable 575.5Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; 6 refusals out of 95 tasks; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Agent Behavior BenchGPT-5.6 Sol76.4Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Agent Behavior BenchClaude Opus 4.865.7Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Agent Behavior BenchGPT-5.570.1Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
FaithfulnessKimi K385.5Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; metric is 1 − hallucination rate (higher is better); developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
FaithfulnessGPT-5.6 Sol84.8Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; metric is 1 − hallucination rate (higher is better); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
FaithfulnessClaude Opus 4.883.6Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; metric is 1 − hallucination rate (higher is better); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
FaithfulnessGPT-5.586.5Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'xhigh'; metric is 1 − hallucination rate (higher is better); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
FaithfulnessGLM-5.274.8Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: N/A; effort 'max'; metric is 1 − hallucination rate (higher is better); reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Chat All-in-One BenchKimi K385.2Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 3
Chat All-in-One BenchClaude Fable 588.0Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Chat All-in-One BenchGPT-5.6 Sol79.0Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Chat All-in-One BenchClaude Opus 4.883.8Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'max'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Chat All-in-One BenchGPT-5.571.8Moonshot in-house benchmark; harness row: Kimi Work; effort 'xhigh'; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.1 Table 3
Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — GamesKimi K355.6%share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'win' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 4
Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — GamesKimi K33.7%share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'tie' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 4
Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — GamesKimi K340.7%share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'lose' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 4
Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — 3D/WebGL/ShaderKimi K372.7%share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'win' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 4
Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — 3D/WebGL/ShaderKimi K313.7%share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'tie' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 4
Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — 3D/WebGL/ShaderKimi K313.6%share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'lose' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 4
Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — Website/UI CloneKimi K352.6%share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'win' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 4
Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — Website/UI CloneKimi K321.1%share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'tie' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 4
Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — Website/UI CloneKimi K326.3%share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'lose' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 4
Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — OverallKimi K358.6%share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'win' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 4
Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — OverallKimi K313.8%share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'tie' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 4
Kimi Webdev Bench (in-house, blind expert judging) — OverallKimi K327.6%share of prompts where Kimi K3 (max) output is rated 'lose' against Claude Opus 4.8 (max); both with the Claude Code harness; developer-reported6.2.1 Table 4
In-house exploit-development suite (Tier 2) — All 36 tasksKimi K314 / 3636 expert-verified tasks (16 user-space, 20 Linux kernel); report also prints 38.9%; 10 of the 14 solved tasks are user-space; developer-reported6.2.2
In-house exploit-development suite (Tier 2) — All 36 tasksGLM-5.28 / 3636 expert-verified tasks; report also prints 22.2%; reported by Moonshot AI in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.2
In-house exploit-development suite (Tier 2) — Human expert effortHuman security experts540 expert-hoursMoonshot's estimate to complete the full suite, about 15 hours per task; every task verified solvable by human experts6.2.2
In-house vulnerability discovery (Tier 1)Kimi K3approximately 70%share of human-reviewed candidate findings confirmed as genuine; includes 16 previously unknown vulnerabilities across six projects; developer-reported6.2.2
32-step simulated enterprise network (UK AISI / CAISI)Kimi K317 stepsmeasured by UK AISI and NIST CAISI (joint assessment), cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report; range takes a human expert roughly 20 hours6.2.2
32-step simulated enterprise network (UK AISI / CAISI)GLM-5.211 stepsmeasured by UK AISI and NIST CAISI (joint assessment), cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report6.2.2
Vals IndexKimi K374.7%measured by Vals AI; effort 'max'; Kimi K3 ranked #2 of 39; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report6.3 Table 5
Vals IndexClaude Fable 575.1%measured by Vals AI; effort 'max'; Kimi K3 ranked #2 of 39; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report6.3 Table 5
Vals IndexGPT-5.6 Sol73.1%measured by Vals AI; effort 'max'; Kimi K3 ranked #2 of 39; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report6.3 Table 5
Vals IndexClaude Opus 4.870.4measured by Vals AI; effort 'max'; Kimi K3 ranked #2 of 39; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report6.3 Table 5
Vals IndexGPT-5.568.0measured by Vals AI; effort 'xhigh'; Kimi K3 ranked #2 of 39; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report6.3 Table 5
Vals IndexGLM-5.265.0measured by Vals AI; effort 'max'; Kimi K3 ranked #2 of 39; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report6.3 Table 5
Agent ArenaKimi K39.1Arena; opened for voting around July 19, 2026; Kimi K3 ranked #4 of 37; unit not stated; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report6.3 and Table 5
Agent ArenaClaude Fable 512.7Arena; opened for voting around July 19, 2026; Kimi K3 ranked #4 of 37; unit not stated; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report6.3 and Table 5
Agent ArenaGPT-5.6 Sol10.1Arena; opened for voting around July 19, 2026; Kimi K3 ranked #4 of 37; unit not stated; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report6.3 and Table 5
Agent ArenaClaude Opus 4.89.8Arena; opened for voting around July 19, 2026; Kimi K3 ranked #4 of 37; unit not stated; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report6.3 and Table 5
Agent ArenaGLM-5.28.8Arena; opened for voting around July 19, 2026; Kimi K3 ranked #4 of 37; unit not stated; independent third-party result as of July 23, 2026, baseline as reported by the source under its own setup; cited by Moonshot in the Kimi K3 technical report6.3 and Table 5
BrowseComp cost per taskKimi K3$2.03 per taskcost of Moonshot's own BrowseComp run at 91.2%; stated as half the cost of GPT-5.6 Sol; developer-reported6.4

Provenance

The raw file is a text parse of the PDF, captured on September 19, 2026; the title page parses without a date, and the date used is that of the weights-and-report release. Multi-line table cells parse imperfectly, and the Hugging Face model card provides a clean copy of Table 2 with per-benchmark sourcing footnotes. The report contains no refusal, jailbreak or other safeguard evaluations of Kimi K3. Confidence is medium: the results are developer-reported or developer-selected third-party figures, and several differ from the launch announcement's table published eleven days earlier.

Relationships