AI Policy Wiki
Dashboard
⚲

Inkling-Small Model Card (Thinking Machines Lab, July 2026)

medium confidence · updated 2026-09-19

Official model card for Inkling-Small, Thinking Machines Lab's 276B-total / 12B-active open-weight multimodal model released under Apache 2.0 on July 30, 2026. Follows the eight-section format of the Inkling card: properties, distribution, training data, a 31-benchmark comparison table against nine other models, and a narrative safety section.

The Inkling-Small model card is the document Thinking Machines Lab published for Inkling-Small, released with open weights under Apache 2.0 on July 30, 2026 (Source: thinkingmachines.ai). It uses the same eight-section layout as the Inkling model card of July 15, 2026, and much of its text on intended uses, training data, safety and limitations is the same with the model name changed. Its distinct content is the model description and the evaluation table.

Model properties and distribution

The card describes Inkling-Small as a multimodal autoregressive transformer: a 42-layer decoder-only model with a sparse Mixture-of-Experts feed-forward backbone in which each token is routed to 6 of 256 experts plus 2 shared experts, with hybrid local and global attention. It has 276B total and 12B active parameters, supports BF16, MXFP8 and NVFP4 numerics, accepts text, images (each dimension ideally 40 to 4096 pixels) and 16 kHz WAV audio (ideally under two minutes), outputs text only, and has a context window of up to 1M tokens. Weights are distributed on Hugging Face in BF16 and NVFP4 checkpoints, with API access through the company's Tinker fine-tuning platform and third-party inference providers. The card gives the self-hosting requirement as at least 600 GB of aggregate GPU memory for the BF16 checkpoint (4 NVIDIA B300 or 8 H200 GPUs) and at least 180 GB for NVFP4 (one B300 in W4A4 mode, or two H200s in W4A16).

On training, the card states only that the data includes text, images, audio and video; that it was drawn from public sources, acquired from third parties, or synthetically generated or augmented; and that curation may include deduplication and filtering for quality, safety or other objectives.

Evaluation approach

Section 5 is a single table comparing Inkling-Small with five open-weight models (Qwen3.5 397B-A17B, MiMo V2.5, Minimax M2.7, DeepSeek V4 Flash and Nemotron 3 Ultra), with Inkling, and with three closed-weight models (Claude 4.5 Haiku, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and GPT 5.6 Luna). A model-information block gives each model's Artificial Analysis index (v4.1) and active and total parameter counts. The benchmarks are grouped as follows:

  • Agentic coding: SWEBench Verified, SWEBench Pro (public), Terminal Bench 2.1 (best harness) and SciCode.
  • General agentic: GDPval-AA v2, MCP Atlas (reported as public-set and all-task figures), Tau 3 Banking, BrowseComp with context management, Toolathlon Verified and AA-Briefcase.
  • Reasoning: GPQA Diamond, Humanity's Last Exam (text only, and with tools), AIME 2026, HMMT February 2026 and CritPt, plus ARC-AGI-1 and ARC-AGI-2 under a separate "abstract" heading.
  • Factuality and chat: SimpleQA Verified, the AA Omniscience index, IFBench and Global-MMLU-Lite.
  • Safety: StrongREJECT and the adversarial and benign splits of FORTRESS.
  • Vision and audio: MMMU Pro (Standard 10), CharXiv reasoning questions with and without Python, Audio MC, MMAU and VoiceBench.

The card does not describe harnesses, sampling settings, effort levels or graders. Five rows carry footnote markers, but the page contains no footnote text for them; the only note states that input images whose long edge is under 2048 pixels are upscaled to the smaller of 2048 pixels or twice their original length. The card does not say which comparison figures Thinking Machines Lab measured and which it took from other publishers.

Safety section

The safety section reports no numeric results. It states that pre-release evaluations covered everyday human-AI interaction (sycophancy, harmful manipulation, parasocial dependency, validation of delusional reasoning, and refusal and over-refusal, including multi-turn external red-teaming) and dangerous capabilities: CBRN and cyber uplift assessed through internal evaluations, external testing and refusal-suppressed variants, and loss-of-control risk assessed through agentic capability, strategic deception and sabotage evaluations, on which the company says it "found the model materially below frontier capabilities." The stated conclusion is that Inkling-Small "did not present risk of material uplift beyond what's already available in the open-weight ecosystem." The residual risk the card identifies is an occasional tendency to comply with role-play and indirectly framed prompts on harmful topics, for which it recommends layering moderation tools such as Llama Guard around the model. The limitations section lists hallucination, instruction-following failures, degraded long multi-turn performance, training-data bias and a knowledge cutoff, and advises against deployment in medical, legal or safety-critical decision-making without further validation and human oversight.

Reported results

Evaluation results the document states for which there is no separate benchmark page; results on benchmarks that have a page are recorded there and cite this page. Scores and settings are as printed in the document.

EvaluationModelScoreSettingSection
SciCodeInkling-Small48.7%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
SciCodeQwen3.5 397B-A17B42.0%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
SciCodeMiMo V2.543.1%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
SciCodeMinimax M2.747.0%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
SciCodeDeepSeek V4 Flash44.9%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
SciCodeNemotron 3 Ultra39.9%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
SciCodeInkling46.1%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
SciCodeClaude 4.5 Haiku43.3%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
SciCodeGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite40.9%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
SciCodeGPT 5.6 Luna50.0%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Toolathlon VerifiedInkling-Small54.4%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
Toolathlon VerifiedQwen3.5 397B-A17B40.7%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Toolathlon VerifiedMiMo V2.549.1%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Toolathlon VerifiedMinimax M2.747.5%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Toolathlon VerifiedDeepSeek V4 Flash50.9%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Toolathlon VerifiedNemotron 3 Ultra34.3%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Toolathlon VerifiedInkling45.5%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
Toolathlon VerifiedClaude 4.5 Haiku26.9%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Toolathlon VerifiedGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite57.1%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Toolathlon VerifiedGPT 5.6 Luna67.9%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
AA-BriefcaseInkling-Small917setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
AA-BriefcaseDeepSeek V4 Flash833setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
AA-BriefcaseNemotron 3 Ultra870setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
AA-BriefcaseInkling839setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
AA-BriefcaseClaude 4.5 Haiku612setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
CritPtInkling-Small8.3%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
CritPtQwen3.5 397B-A17B1.7%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
CritPtMiMo V2.53.7%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
CritPtMinimax M2.70.6%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
CritPtDeepSeek V4 Flash7.1%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
CritPtNemotron 3 Ultra3.1%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
CritPtInkling5.4%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
CritPtClaude 4.5 Haiku0.0%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
CritPtGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite0.0%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
CritPtGPT 5.6 Luna20.6%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
AA Omniscience (index)Inkling-Small-9.0index value; developer-reported5. Evaluations
AA Omniscience (index)Qwen3.5 397B-A17B-29.8index value; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
AA Omniscience (index)MiMo V2.5-9.3index value; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
AA Omniscience (index)Minimax M2.70.7index value; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
AA Omniscience (index)DeepSeek V4 Flash-22.9index value; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
AA Omniscience (index)Nemotron 3 Ultra-1.0index value; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
AA Omniscience (index)Inkling2.1index value; developer-reported5. Evaluations
AA Omniscience (index)Claude 4.5 Haiku-4.2index value; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
AA Omniscience (index)Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite6.9index value; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
AA Omniscience (index)GPT 5.6 Luna-11.6index value; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
IFBenchInkling-Small82.2%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
IFBenchQwen3.5 397B-A17B78.8%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
IFBenchMiMo V2.567.1%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
IFBenchMinimax M2.775.7%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
IFBenchDeepSeek V4 Flash79.2%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
IFBenchNemotron 3 Ultra81.4%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
IFBenchInkling79.8%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
IFBenchClaude 4.5 Haiku54.3%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
IFBenchGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite78.6%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
IFBenchGPT 5.6 Luna67.3%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Global-MMLU-LiteInkling-Small86.7%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
Global-MMLU-LiteQwen3.5 397B-A17B90.0%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Global-MMLU-LiteMiMo V2.583.5%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Global-MMLU-LiteMinimax M2.783.9%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Global-MMLU-LiteDeepSeek V4 Flash88.4%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Global-MMLU-LiteNemotron 3 Ultra85.6%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Global-MMLU-LiteInkling88.7%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
Global-MMLU-LiteClaude 4.5 Haiku83.4%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Global-MMLU-LiteGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite89.4%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Global-MMLU-LiteGPT 5.6 Luna88.7%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (adversarial) — AdversarialInkling-Small71.6%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (adversarial) — AdversarialQwen3.5 397B-A17B77.3%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (adversarial) — AdversarialMiMo V2.564.8%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (adversarial) — AdversarialMinimax M2.786.3%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (adversarial) — AdversarialDeepSeek V4 Flash32.0%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (adversarial) — AdversarialNemotron 3 Ultra77.6%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (adversarial) — AdversarialInkling78.0%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (adversarial) — AdversarialClaude 4.5 Haiku91.3%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (adversarial) — AdversarialGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite70.7%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (adversarial) — AdversarialGPT 5.6 Luna83.8%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (benign) — BenignInkling-Small96.9%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (benign) — BenignQwen3.5 397B-A17B95.4%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (benign) — BenignMiMo V2.594.6%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (benign) — BenignMinimax M2.790.1%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (benign) — BenignDeepSeek V4 Flash99.2%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (benign) — BenignNemotron 3 Ultra90.6%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (benign) — BenignInkling95.9%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (benign) — BenignClaude 4.5 Haiku94.1%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (benign) — BenignGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite95.5%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
FORTRESS (benign) — BenignGPT 5.6 Luna97.8%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Audio MCInkling-Small54.9%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
Audio MCMiMo V2.530.4%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
Audio MCInkling56.6%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
Audio MCGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite33.6%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
MMAUInkling-Small77.0%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
MMAUMiMo V2.573.6%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
MMAUInkling77.2%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
MMAUGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite75.2%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
VoiceBenchInkling-Small90.1%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
VoiceBenchMiMo V2.586.4%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations
VoiceBenchInkling91.4%setting not stated; developer-reported5. Evaluations
VoiceBenchGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite85.9%setting not stated; reported by Thinking Machines Lab in the Inkling-Small model card5. Evaluations

Provenance

The raw file is the full text of the live page as scraped on September 19, 2026. The page carries no revision date. All results are reported by the developer, including those for other companies' models, which is the basis for the medium confidence rating.

Relationships